Court, Explained
U.S. Federal District Courts
←Back to docket
S.D.N.Y.Procedural orderFiled June 27, 2022

Bishop v. Dalton Kent Securities Group, Inc.

Judge
Paul Crotty
Docket
1:21-cv-08957
Court
U.S. District Court · Southern District of New York
Pages
1
Civil ProcedureArbitration
In one sentence

In Bishop v. Dalton Kent Securities Group, Judge Crotty adopted a recommendation to enter default judgment confirming Bishop’s financial-industry arbitration award.

Who this affects

Levant Miguel Bishop and Dalton Kent Securities Group, Inc.; the court adopted a recommendation to enter a default judgment confirming the FINRA arbitration award.

What happened

In Bishop v. Dalton Kent Securities Group, Levant Miguel Bishop asked the court to enter a default judgment confirming a Financial Industry Regulatory Authority arbitration award in his favor against Dalton Kent Securities Group, Inc.

A magistrate judge recommended entering the default judgment. No party objected, so the court reviewed the recommendation for clear error in the record.

Judge Paul A. Crotty found no clear error, adopted the recommendation in full, and said the court would separately enter the proposed default judgment. The clerk was directed to terminate two pending motions.

The detailed version

For law students, journalists, and other readers who want the full reasoning

Case
Bishop v. Dalton Kent Securities Group, Inc. · No. 1:21-cv-08957
Judge
Paul Crotty
Date
June 27, 2022

Background

Levant Miguel Bishop sought a default judgment confirming a Financial Industry Regulatory Authority (FINRA) arbitration award entered in his favor against Dalton Kent Securities Group, Inc.

Report and Recommendation

On June 6, 2022, Magistrate Judge Sarah L. Cave issued a Report and Recommendation recommending that the court enter the default judgment. No party filed an objection.

Court’s Analysis and Ruling

When no timely objection is made to a magistrate judge’s recommendation, the district court reviews the record for clear error. Judge Paul A. Crotty found no clear error and adopted the Report and Recommendation in full. The court stated that it would separately enter the proposed default judgment. The clerk was directed to terminate the pending motions at ECF Numbers 16 and 31.

The authoritative version

Read the full 1-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.

Open opinion PDF →
Summary written with AI assistance. See how summaries are made. Spot something wrong? Tell us.