Komatsu v. The City of New York
- Louis Stanton
- 1:20-cv-06510
- U.S. District Court · Southern District of New York
- 2
In Komatsu v. The City of New York, Judge Stanton denied further relief after dismissal and ordered future dismissal-related motions terminated.
Towaki Komatsu and any future filings in this closed action seeking relief from its dismissal.
What happened
Towaki Komatsu filed this case without a lawyer against The City of New York and others. The court dismissed the case in October 2020, and the Second Circuit affirmed that dismissal in December 2021.
Komatsu later sought relief from the dismissal and judgment under Rules 59(e) and 60(b), but the court denied that request on June 3, 2022. After that denial, Komatsu filed several more submissions, including a request for an emergency injunction.
The court denied any relief sought in submissions filed after June 3, 2022, and directed the Clerk to terminate any future motion seeking relief from the dismissal. Judge Stanton stated that any genuinely new matter should be brought in a new case.
The detailed version
- Komatsu v. The City of New York · No. 1:20-cv-06510
- Louis Stanton
- June 28, 2022
Background
Towaki Komatsu filed this action without a lawyer. The court had dismissed the action in an order issued on October 21, 2020, and entered on October 22, 2020, along with a judgment entered on October 22, 2020. The Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit affirmed the dismissal on December 20, 2021.
Komatsu later filed letters that the district court treated as a motion for relief from the dismissal order and judgment under Rule 59(e) or, alternatively, Rule 60(b) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. The district court denied that motion on June 3, 2022.
Subsequent filings
On June 16, 2022, Komatsu filed an emergency request for a preliminary injunction and temporary restraining order. He filed additional letters or submissions on June 19, June 20, and June 23, 2022. The opinion does not describe the substance of those submissions in detail.
Ruling
The court stated that the action had long been closed and that the Second Circuit had affirmed the dismissal. It therefore denied any relief Komatsu sought in submissions filed after the court's June 3, 2022 denial of postjudgment relief. “Postjudgment relief” means a request to change or undo a judgment after the case has ended.
The court also directed the Clerk of Court to terminate any future motion Komatsu filed in this action seeking relief from the dismissal. It stated that new matters should be presented in a new case assigned through the court's regular process. The order did not add a separate statement that the dismissal was with or without prejudice.
Read the full 2-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.