Court, Explained
U.S. Federal District Courts
←Back to docket
S.D.N.Y.Procedural orderFiled June 29, 2022

Lisanti, Jr. v. Equifax Information Services, LLC

Judge
Ronnie Abrams
Docket
1:21-cv-10681
Court
U.S. District Court · Southern District of New York
Pages
1
Civil ProcedureContract
In one sentence

Lisanti v. Equifax: Judge Abrams discontinued the settled-in-principle case without costs and allowed timely restoration.

Who this affects

Vincent Louis Lisanti, Jr., Equifax Information Services, LLC, and Experian Information Solutions, Inc.; the case was closed, subject to a possible timely application to restore it.

What happened

In Lisanti, Jr. v. Equifax Information Services, LLC, the court was told that Vincent Louis Lisanti, Jr.’s case against Equifax and Experian had been settled in principle.

The court discontinued the case without costs to any party and without prejudice to restoring it if an application was made within 30 days.

Judge Ronnie Abrams directed the Clerk of Court to close the case and explained that any request to keep jurisdiction to enforce a settlement had to be placed on the public record and approved by the court within 30 days.

The detailed version

For law students, journalists, and other readers who want the full reasoning

Case
Lisanti, Jr. v. Equifax Information Services, LLC · No. 1:21-cv-10681
Judge
Ronnie Abrams
Date
June 29, 2022

Background The court stated that it had been reported that this case had been settled in principle. The opinion identifies Vincent Louis Lisanti, Jr. as the plaintiff and Equifax Information Services, LLC and Experian Information Solutions, Inc. as the defendants. It does not describe the underlying claims or the settlement’s terms.

Court’s action The court ordered that the action be discontinued without costs to any party and without prejudice to restoring the action to the court’s docket if an application to restore it was made within 30 days. The court warned that an application filed after that period could be denied solely because it was late.

The court also stated that, if the parties wanted the court to retain authority to enforce a settlement agreement, the agreement’s terms had to be placed on the public record and approved by the court within the same 30-day period. The Clerk of Court was directed to close the case. Judge Ronnie Abrams signed the order.

The authoritative version

Read the full 1-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.

Open opinion PDF →
Summary written with AI assistance. See how summaries are made. Spot something wrong? Tell us.