Court, Explained
U.S. Federal District Courts
←Back to docket
S.D.N.Y.Procedural orderFiled June 30, 2022

Bodziony v. Wolfgang's Steakhouse Inc.

Judge
Lewis Liman
Docket
1:20-cv-08016
Court
U.S. District Court · Southern District of New York
Pages
1
Civil ProcedureFee Petition
In one sentence

In Bodziony v. Wolfgang’s Steakhouse, Judge Liman approved the settlement and dismissed the action, allowing restoration within 30 days.

Who this affects

The plaintiffs, Wolfgang’s Steakhouse Inc., plaintiffs’ counsel, and any parties involved in pending motions, conferences, or deadlines in the action.

What happened

In Bodziony v. Wolfgang’s Steakhouse Inc., the court held a hearing about the parties’ settlement on June 16, 2022. The opinion does not describe the settlement’s terms.

The court found the settlement fair and reasonable and approved the request by the plaintiffs’ lawyer for attorneys’ fees and costs. It also dismissed any pending motions as moot.

Judge Lewis J. Liman dismissed the action without costs and without prejudice to restoring it to the court’s calendar if an application was made within 30 days. The court canceled all conferences and deadlines.

The detailed version

For law students, journalists, and other readers who want the full reasoning

Case
Bodziony v. Wolfgang's Steakhouse Inc. · No. 1:20-cv-08016
Judge
Lewis Liman
Date
June 30, 2022

Background

The court held a hearing on the parties’ settlement on June 16, 2022. The opinion does not provide the settlement’s terms or describe the claims underlying the action.

Court’s Analysis

For the reasons stated at the hearing, the court found that the settlement was fair and reasonable. It approved the request by plaintiffs’ counsel for attorneys’ fees and costs, citing decisions concerning review of settlements and fee requests.

Disposition

The court ordered that the action be dismissed without costs and without prejudice to restoring the action to the Court’s calendar, provided an application to restore it was made within 30 days of the order. The court stated that an application filed after 30 days might be denied solely because it was late. Any pending motions were dismissed as moot, and all conferences and deadlines were canceled.

The authoritative version

Read the full 1-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.

Open opinion PDF →
Summary written with AI assistance. See how summaries are made. Spot something wrong? Tell us.