Court, Explained
U.S. Federal District Courts
←Back to docket
S.D.N.Y.Procedural orderFiled July 8, 2022

Trustees Of The New York City District Council Of Carpenters Pension Fund v…

Full caption

Trustees Of The New York City District Council Of Carpenters Pension Fund, Welfare Fund, Annuity Fund, and Apprenticeship, Journeyman Retraining, Educational and Industry Fund v. Architectural Metal Concept LLC

Judge
Gregory Woods
Docket
1:22-cv-05729
Court
U.S. District Court · Southern District of New York
Pages
1
ArbitrationCivil ProcedureSummary Judgment
In one sentence

In Trustees of the New York City District Council of Carpenters Pension Fund v. Architectural Metal Concept LLC, Judge Woods set deadlines for an arbitration-confirmation petition.

Who this affects

The petitioners seeking confirmation of the arbitration award and Architectural Metal Concept LLC, the respondent, were affected by the filing, service, opposition, and reply deadlines.

What happened

Trustees of the New York City District Council of Carpenters Pension Fund v. Architectural Metal Concept LLC concerns the petitioners’ request to confirm an arbitration award. The petition was filed on July 6, 2022.

The court ordered the petitioners to file and serve a statement required by Local Civil Rule 56.1 and supporting materials by July 20, 2022. The petitioners also had to serve the petition and supporting materials by July 15 and file proof of service by July 19.

Judge Gregory H. Woods set September 6, 2022, for the respondent’s opposition and September 20, 2022, for any reply. The order set a briefing schedule and did not decide whether to confirm the arbitration award.

The detailed version

For law students, journalists, and other readers who want the full reasoning

Case
Trustees Of The New York City District Council Of Carpenters Pension Fund v… · No. 1:22-cv-05729
Judge
Gregory Woods
Date
July 8, 2022

Background

The petitioners filed a petition to confirm an arbitration award on July 6, 2022. The court explained that proceedings to confirm an arbitration award are treated similarly to a motion for summary judgment, meaning the parties must present supporting materials for the court’s review.

Orders and deadlines

The court ordered the petitioners to file and serve a statement under Local Civil Rule 56.1 and any additional materials supporting the petition by July 20, 2022. Those materials could include affidavits or declarations confirming that the petition’s exhibits were true and correct copies of the documents they purported to be.

The court also directed the petitioners to serve the petition and supporting materials on Architectural Metal Concept LLC by July 15, 2022, and to file an affidavit confirming service by July 19, 2022. The respondent’s opposition was due September 6, 2022, and the petitioners’ reply, if any, was due September 20, 2022.

Disposition

Judge Gregory H. Woods issued a scheduling order. The opinion did not grant or deny the petition to confirm the arbitration award and did not resolve the merits of that request.

The authoritative version

Read the full 1-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.

Open opinion PDF →
Summary written with AI assistance. See how summaries are made. Spot something wrong? Tell us.