Court, Explained
U.S. Federal District Courts
←Back to docket
S.D.N.Y.Substantive rulingFiled July 8, 2022

Maurer v. Commissioner of the Social Security

Judge
Kenneth Karas
Docket
7:21-cv-06518
Court
U.S. District Court · Southern District of New York
Pages
2
Social SecurityCivil Procedure
In one sentence

In Maurer v. Commissioner, Judge Karas adopted the recommendation, granted Maurer’s motion, denied the Commissioner’s motion, and ordered further proceedings.

Who this affects

Katie Ann Maurer and the Commissioner of Social Security. The case was remanded to the Commissioner for further administrative proceedings concerning Maurer’s application for Disability Insurance Benefits.

What happened

Katie Ann Maurer asked the court to review the Social Security Commissioner’s partial denial of her application for Disability Insurance Benefits. Both sides asked for judgment based on the court filings.

Magistrate Judge Judith C. McCarthy recommended granting Maurer’s motion and denying the Commissioner’s cross-motion. Neither side objected to that recommendation, so the court reviewed it for clear error.

Judge Kenneth M. Karas adopted the recommendation in full, granted Maurer’s motion, denied the Commissioner’s cross-motion, entered judgment for Maurer, and remanded the matter to the Commissioner for further administrative proceedings.

The detailed version

For law students, journalists, and other readers who want the full reasoning

Case
Maurer v. Commissioner of the Social Security · No. 7:21-cv-06518
Judge
Kenneth Karas
Date
July 8, 2022

Background

Katie Ann Maurer sought judicial review under 42 U.S.C. § 405(g) of the final decision of the Commissioner of Social Security. The Commissioner had partially denied Maurer’s application for Disability Insurance Benefits.

Maurer moved for judgment on the pleadings, and the Commissioner filed a cross-motion for judgment on the pleadings. These motions ask the court to decide the case based on the pleadings and related materials, without a trial.

Report and Recommendation

The case had been referred to Magistrate Judge Judith C. McCarthy. On June 17, 2022, Judge McCarthy recommended granting Maurer’s motion and denying the Commissioner’s cross-motion. The parties did not file objections.

Because there were no objections, Judge Karas reviewed the recommendation for clear error, meaning an obvious mistake. He stated that he found no error, clear or otherwise, and adopted the recommendation.

Ruling

The court ordered that the Report and Recommendation be adopted in its entirety. It granted Maurer’s Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings, denied the Commissioner’s Cross-Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings, ordered judgment in favor of Maurer, and remanded the matter to the Commissioner for further administrative proceedings.

The order does not explain the underlying reasons for the recommended remand or identify what further administrative actions the Commissioner must take.

The authoritative version

Read the full 2-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.

Open opinion PDF →
Summary written with AI assistance. See how summaries are made. Spot something wrong? Tell us.