Court, Explained
U.S. Federal District Courts
←Back to docket
S.D.N.Y.Procedural orderFiled July 11, 2022

Nexstar Media Inc. v. Comcast Cable Communications, LLC

Judge
John Koeltl
Docket
1:21-cv-06860
Court
U.S. District Court · Southern District of New York
Pages
3
Civil ProcedureContract
In one sentence

In Nexstar Media v. Comcast, Judge Koeltl granted Nexstar’s application to permanently and temporarily seal confidential materials.

Who this affects

Nexstar Media Inc., Comcast Cable Communications, LLC, Mission Broadcasting, Inc., and members of the public seeking access to the identified court filings.

What happened

Nexstar Media Inc. sued Comcast Cable Communications, LLC in a dispute involving a confidential retransmission-consent agreement. Nexstar asked the court to restrict public access to parts of its motion and supporting materials.

Nexstar sought permanent sealing for references to the agreement, its pricing terms, and related communications. It also sought temporary sealing for information previously sealed at Mission Broadcasting, Inc.’s request, while Mission prepared its own request for confidential treatment.

The court granted the application. Judge John G. Koeltl therefore allowed the requested permanent and temporary sealing described in Nexstar’s filing.

The detailed version

For law students, journalists, and other readers who want the full reasoning

Case
Nexstar Media Inc. v. Comcast Cable Communications, LLC · No. 1:21-cv-06860
Judge
John Koeltl
Date
July 11, 2022

Background

Nexstar Media Inc. is the plaintiff and counterclaim defendant. Comcast Cable Communications, LLC is the defendant, counterclaim plaintiff, and third-party plaintiff. Nexstar’s filing concerned materials submitted in connection with Nexstar’s motion to dismiss Comcast’s counterclaim and Comcast’s motion. The materials included a retransmission-consent agreement between Nexstar and Comcast, related correspondence, and information that had previously been sealed.

Sealing requests

Nexstar asked for permission to file some material under permanent seal. It said the agreement contained commercially sensitive pricing rates and other terms, and that disclosure could harm the parties’ competitive positions and future negotiations. The permanent-sealing request covered references to the agreement and related communications, as well as the agreement and an April 8, 2021 letter attached as exhibits.

Nexstar separately sought temporary sealing for information that had previously been sealed at the request of Mission Broadcasting, Inc. Nexstar stated that Mission planned to file a motion to dismiss Comcast’s third-party complaint and intended to seek confidential treatment for information appearing in that motion. Nexstar said it would redact that information temporarily unless the relevant party filed its own sealing request within three days. The filing stated that Comcast and Mission did not oppose Nexstar’s letter-motion.

Ruling

The filing bears an “APPLICATION GRANTED” notation. The court granted Nexstar’s application to file the identified materials under permanent and temporary seal. The text provided does not include a separate written explanation or a more detailed description of the court’s ruling. Judge John G. Koeltl issued the ruling.

The authoritative version

Read the full 3-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.

Open opinion PDF →
Summary written with AI assistance. See how summaries are made. Spot something wrong? Tell us.