Court, Explained
U.S. Federal District Courts
←Back to docket
S.D.N.Y.Procedural orderFiled July 11, 2022

DeBlasio v. Nieves

Judge
Analisa Torres
Docket
1:18-cv-09360
Court
U.S. District Court · Southern District of New York
Pages
1
Civil ProcedurePro Se
In one sentence

In DeBlasio v. Nieves, Judge Torres adopted an unchallenged recommendation and dismissed the case.

Who this affects

Philip E. DeBlasio and the defendants in DeBlasio v. Nieves; the case was dismissed and closed, and the court directed that all open motions be terminated.

What happened

In DeBlasio v. Nieves, a magistrate judge issued a report and recommendation on March 28, 2022, and mailed it to Plaintiff Philip E. DeBlasio, who was representing himself.

The court received no objections by the April 12, 2022 deadline. Judge Analisa Torres therefore reviewed the recommendation for clear error and found none.

Judge Torres adopted the recommendation in its entirety and dismissed the case. She directed the Clerk of Court to terminate all open motions, close the case, and mail the order to DeBlasio.

The detailed version

For law students, journalists, and other readers who want the full reasoning

Case
DeBlasio v. Nieves · No. 1:18-cv-09360
Judge
Analisa Torres
Date
July 11, 2022

Background

The opinion concerns a report and recommendation issued by Magistrate Judge Ona T. Wang on March 28, 2022. The recommendation was mailed to Plaintiff Philip E. DeBlasio, who was representing himself, on March 29, 2022.

Review of the Recommendation

The court received no objections by the April 12, 2022 deadline. Because there were no objections, the court reviewed the report and recommendation for clear error, meaning an obvious mistake. The court found no clear error.

Ruling

Judge Analisa Torres adopted the report and recommendation in its entirety and dismissed the case. The Clerk of Court was directed to terminate all open motions, close the case, and mail a copy of the order to DeBlasio. The opinion does not state the basis for the recommended dismissal because the report and recommendation is not included in the provided text.

The authoritative version

Read the full 1-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.

Open opinion PDF →
Summary written with AI assistance. See how summaries are made. Spot something wrong? Tell us.