Court, Explained
U.S. Federal District Courts
←Back to docket
S.D.N.Y.Procedural orderFiled July 12, 2022

Nexstar Media Inc. v. Comcast Cable Communications, LLC

Judge
John Koeltl
Docket
1:21-cv-06860
Court
U.S. District Court · Southern District of New York
Pages
2
Civil Procedure
In one sentence

In Nexstar Media v. Comcast, Judge Koeltl granted Nexstar’s application to permanently seal commercially sensitive filings and agreement materials.

Who this affects

Nexstar Media Inc., Comcast Cable Communications, LLC, Mission Broadcasting, Inc., and the public’s access to the specified court filings.

What happened

Nexstar Media Inc. v. Comcast Cable Communications, LLC concerns Nexstar’s request to permanently seal confidential material in Mission Broadcasting, Inc.’s motion to dismiss and a supporting declaration exhibit. The materials referred to or included a retransmission consent agreement between Nexstar and Comcast.

Nexstar argued that the agreement contained sensitive pricing and other terms, and that disclosure could harm both companies competitively. Nexstar also pointed to earlier orders sealing the agreement, related correspondence, and references to those materials in other filings.

The court granted the application to permanently seal the unredacted versions of the motion and declaration exhibit. Judge John G. Koeltl entered the order.

The detailed version

For law students, journalists, and other readers who want the full reasoning

Case
Nexstar Media Inc. v. Comcast Cable Communications, LLC · No. 1:21-cv-06860
Judge
John Koeltl
Date
July 12, 2022

Background

Nexstar Media Inc. sued Comcast Cable Communications, LLC. In the case, Mission Broadcasting, Inc. filed a motion to dismiss Comcast’s third-party complaint and a supporting declaration with an exhibit. Some material in those filings had been temporarily sealed.

Nexstar asked the court to permanently seal the unredacted versions of Mission’s motion and the exhibit to the declaration. The motion discussed correspondence between Nexstar and Comcast concerning a commercially sensitive retransmission consent agreement, and the exhibit attached the agreement itself.

Arguments

Nexstar stated that the agreement contained pricing rates and other terms whose disclosure could disadvantage the parties in negotiations with competitors and cable companies. Nexstar also noted that the court had previously permanently sealed the agreement, related correspondence, and references to those materials in other filings.

Ruling

The court granted Nexstar’s application to permanently seal the unredacted versions of the motion and the declaration exhibit. Judge John G. Koeltl entered the order. This was a procedural ruling about public access to court filings; the text does not decide the underlying claims or defenses in the case.

The authoritative version

Read the full 2-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.

Open opinion PDF →
Summary written with AI assistance. See how summaries are made. Spot something wrong? Tell us.