Court, Explained
U.S. Federal District Courts
←Back to docket
S.D.N.Y.Procedural orderFiled July 12, 2022

Huang v. Shanghai City Corp

Judge
Lewis Liman
Docket
1:19-cv-07702
Court
U.S. District Court · Southern District of New York
Pages
1
Civil ProcedureFee Petition
In one sentence

In Huer Huang v. Shanghai City Corp., Judge Liman cancelled trial after settlement and scheduled a hearing on approval and fees.

Who this affects

The parties and Plaintiffs’ counsel, particularly regarding the written settlement agreement, settlement approval, and documentation for the requested attorney-fee award.

What happened

In Huer Huang v. Shanghai City Corp., the parties reached a settlement, and the court cancelled the trial scheduled for July 12, 2022.

The court ordered the parties to submit a written settlement agreement by July 22. Plaintiffs’ counsel also must provide information and supporting documents for the requested attorney-fee award; inadequate documentation could lead the court to reject the proposed fee award.

Judge Lewis J. Liman scheduled a telephone hearing for July 29, 2022, to consider whether to approve the settlement under the standards identified in the order.

The detailed version

For law students, journalists, and other readers who want the full reasoning

Case
Huang v. Shanghai City Corp · No. 1:19-cv-07702
Judge
Lewis Liman
Date
July 12, 2022

What the Court Ordered

The trial scheduled to begin on July 12, 2022, was cancelled because the parties had reached a settlement. The material terms of the settlement were read and agreed to in open court.

The parties were directed to submit a written settlement agreement by July 22, 2022. Plaintiffs’ counsel was also directed to submit information concerning the requested attorney-fee award, along with supporting documentation if appropriate.

Attorney Fees

The court stated that merely identifying the requested fee as a proportion of the total settlement amount would not be enough. The reasonableness of the fees must be supported by adequate documentation, which ordinarily includes contemporaneous time records showing, for each attorney, the date, hours worked, and nature of the work. The order warned that insufficient documentation could result in rejection of the proposed fee award.

Settlement-Approval Hearing

The court scheduled a telephone hearing for July 29, 2022, at 11:00 a.m. to consider whether the settlement should be approved under the standards cited in the order. The order does not state that the settlement had been finally approved or that the attorney-fee award had been granted.

The authoritative version

Read the full 1-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.

Open opinion PDF →
Summary written with AI assistance. See how summaries are made. Spot something wrong? Tell us.