Court, Explained
U.S. Federal District Courts
←Back to docket
S.D.N.Y.Procedural orderFiled July 18, 2022

Galloway v. Commissioner of Social Security

Judge
Paul Engelmayer
Docket
1:19-cv-03400-PAE-JLC
Court
U.S. District Court · Southern District of New York
Pages
2
Fee PetitionSocial Security
In one sentence

In Galloway v. Commissioner, Judge Engelmayer granted counsel $6,675 in fees and ordered $1,794.07 returned to Galloway.

Who this affects

Darren Franklin Galloway and his counsel, Michael S. Aranoff, were directly affected; the Commissioner of Social Security was the opposing party.

What happened

In Galloway v. Commissioner of Social Security, the court reviewed a request by Galloway’s counsel, Michael S. Aranoff, for attorney fees under the Social Security Act. The request followed a favorable decision for Galloway after the case was sent back to the Commissioner.

A magistrate judge recommended awarding $6,675 in fees and requiring Aranoff to return $1,794.07 to Galloway. No party objected to that recommendation, so the court reviewed it for clear error and found none.

Judge Paul A. Engelmayer adopted the recommendation in full. He granted the fee motion for $6,675 and ordered Galloway’s counsel to return $1,794.07 to Galloway. The court also stated that the parties’ failure to object waived appellate review.

The detailed version

For law students, journalists, and other readers who want the full reasoning

Case
Galloway v. Commissioner of Social Security · No. 1:19-cv-03400-PAE-JLC
Judge
Paul Engelmayer
Date
July 18, 2022

Background

The pending motion sought attorney fees under Section 406(b) of the Social Security Act, 42 U.S.C. § 406(b). Plaintiff’s counsel, Michael S. Aranoff, filed the motion after the Commissioner issued a favorable decision for Darren Franklin Galloway following the remand of the case to the Commissioner.

Report and Recommendation

United States Magistrate Judge James L. Cott recommended granting the motion for $6,675 in fees and requiring Aranoff to return $1,794.07 to Galloway. The district court noted that no party had objected to the recommendation.

Court’s Review and Ruling

When no timely objection is made to a magistrate judge’s report and recommendation, the district court reviews the report for clear error. The court reviewed Judge Cott’s report, found no facial error, and adopted it in its entirety. The court granted the motion for fees in the amount of $6,675 and ordered that $1,794.07 be returned to Galloway by his counsel. The court also stated that the parties’ failure to object waived appellate review.

The authoritative version

Read the full 2-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.

Open opinion PDF →
Summary written with AI assistance. See how summaries are made. Spot something wrong? Tell us.