Court, Explained
U.S. Federal District Courts
←Back to docket
S.D.N.Y.Procedural orderFiled July 18, 2022

Securities and Exchange Commission v. Ripple Labs Inc.

Judge
Analisa Torres
Docket
1:20-cv-10832
Court
U.S. District Court · Southern District of New York
Pages
1
Civil ProcedureSecurities
In one sentence

In Securities and Exchange Commission v. Ripple Labs, Judge Torres ordered redacted public filings and set deadlines for the parties’ submissions.

Who this affects

The Securities and Exchange Commission, Ripple Labs, Inc., Bradley Garlinghouse, Christian A. Larsen, the unidentified movants, and members of the public seeking access to the filings were affected by the redaction and filing requirements.

What happened

Securities and Exchange Commission v. Ripple Labs Inc. concerned proposed redactions to court filings and supporting exhibits.

The court reviewed the parties’ letters proposing redactions and found that the redactions were narrowly tailored to protect the higher values identified by the parties. It ordered public versions of specified letters and exhibits to be filed with those redactions.

The order set deadlines for the filings and for the movants’ response to the SEC’s letter. Judge Analisa Torres issued the order on July 18, 2022.

The detailed version

For law students, journalists, and other readers who want the full reasoning

Case
Securities and Exchange Commission v. Ripple Labs Inc. · No. 1:20-cv-10832
Judge
Analisa Torres
Date
July 18, 2022

Background

The case names the Securities and Exchange Commission as the plaintiff and Ripple Labs, Inc., Bradley Garlinghouse, and Christian A. Larsen as defendants. The order addressed proposed redactions to filings concerning a request by unidentified movants.

Court’s Analysis

The court reviewed the parties’ letters proposing redactions, filed on July 15, 2022. It found that the proposed redactions were “narrowly tailored” to preserve the “higher values” identified by the parties.

Order

The court ordered the parties to publicly file, by July 19, 2022, versions of the SEC’s opposition letter, the defendants’ response letter, and the exhibits supporting both letters that complied with the court’s July 11, 2022 order and included the redactions discussed in the parties’ letters. The court also ordered the movants to file their response to the SEC’s letter by July 25, 2022. Judge Analisa Torres signed the order.

The authoritative version

Read the full 1-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.

Open opinion PDF →
Summary written with AI assistance. See how summaries are made. Spot something wrong? Tell us.