Court, Explained
U.S. Federal District Courts
←Back to docket
S.D.N.Y.Procedural orderFiled July 19, 2022

Hyndman v. Small Business Administration

Judge
Philip Halpern
Docket
7:22-cv-04973
Court
U.S. District Court · Southern District of New York
Pages
3
Civil ProcedurePro Se
In one sentence

In Hyndman v. Small Business Administration, Judge Halpern ordered service through Marshals after granting Hyndman permission to proceed without prepaying fees.

Who this affects

Dante Hyndman, the Small Business Administration, Isabel Guzman, Janet Yellen, and the United States.

What happened

Dante Hyndman sued the Small Business Administration, Isabel Guzman, Janet Yellen, and the United States under the Administrative Procedure Act, seeking review of the Small Business Administration’s decision denying him a COVID-19 Economic Injury Disaster Loan.

The court had allowed Hyndman to proceed without prepaying court fees. Because of that, the court said the U.S. Marshals Service would handle service of the summonses and complaint. The time for service was extended to 90 days after the summonses are issued.

Judge Halpern ordered the Clerk of Court to issue the summonses, complete the service forms, and provide the necessary documents to the Marshals Service. The order also told Hyndman to request more time if service was not completed within 90 days and to notify the court in writing if his address changes.

The detailed version

For law students, journalists, and other readers who want the full reasoning

Case
Hyndman v. Small Business Administration · No. 7:22-cv-04973
Judge
Philip Halpern
Date
July 19, 2022

Background

Dante Hyndman, representing himself, brought an action under the Administrative Procedure Act seeking review of the Small Business Administration’s decision to deny him a COVID-19 Economic Injury Disaster Loan. The defendants are the Small Business Administration; Isabel Guzman, identified as the Small Business Administration’s Administrator; Janet Yellen, identified as the Secretary of the Treasury; and the United States.

The court had previously granted Hyndman permission to proceed without prepaying court fees. The opinion explains that a person proceeding this way may rely on the court and the U.S. Marshals Service to serve the defendants.

Service Instructions

The court instructed the Clerk of Court to prepare a U.S. Marshals Service Process Receipt and Return form for each defendant, mark the forms for service on the United States, issue summonses, and give the Marshals Service the order and other paperwork needed to complete service.

The court extended the service deadline until 90 days after the summonses are issued because Hyndman could not serve the summonses and complaint before the court reviewed the complaint and ordered the summonses issued. If service is not completed within that period, the opinion states that Hyndman should request an extension of time. It also states that Hyndman must notify the court in writing if his address changes and that the court may dismiss the action if he fails to do so.

Ruling

Judge Philip M. Halpern ordered the Clerk of Court to issue the summonses, complete the service forms with each defendant’s address, mark the forms for service on the United States, and deliver the required documents to the Marshals Service. The Clerk was also directed to mail an information package to Hyndman. This order addressed service of the lawsuit and did not decide whether the Small Business Administration lawfully denied the loan.

The authoritative version

Read the full 3-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.

Open opinion PDF →
Summary written with AI assistance. See how summaries are made. Spot something wrong? Tell us.