Court, Explained
U.S. Federal District Courts
←Back to docket
S.D.N.Y.Procedural orderFiled July 19, 2022

Robinson v. City of Yonkers Police Department

Judge
Andrew Krause
Docket
7:22-cv-03333
Court
U.S. District Court · Southern District of New York
Pages
1
Civil Procedure
In one sentence

Robinson v. City of Yonkers Police Department: Judge Swain dismissed the complaint after Robinson failed to file an amended complaint.

Who this affects

Quamaine Dawson Robinson's complaint was dismissed after the required amended complaint was not filed; the court also denied permission to appeal without paying the filing fee.

What happened

In Robinson v. City of Yonkers Police Department, the court had ordered Quamaine Dawson Robinson to file an amended complaint within 60 days. The order warned that failing to do so would lead to dismissal.

Robinson did not file an amended complaint. The court dismissed the complaint under the federal statute governing complaints filed without paying the filing fee and ordered that judgment be entered. It also denied Robinson permission to appeal without paying the fee, finding that an appeal would not be taken in good faith.

Judge Laura Taylor Swain signed the order on July 19, 2022.

The detailed version

For law students, journalists, and other readers who want the full reasoning

Case
Robinson v. City of Yonkers Police Department · No. 7:22-cv-03333
Judge
Andrew Krause
Date
July 19, 2022

Background

On May 16, 2022, the court ordered Plaintiff to file an amended complaint within 60 days. The order expressly stated that failure to comply would result in dismissal. The opinion states that the complaint had been filed without payment of the filing fee under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(1).

Ruling

Plaintiff did not file an amended complaint. The court therefore dismissed the complaint under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B)(ii), a provision governing dismissal of certain complaints filed without payment of the filing fee. The court ordered that judgment be entered.

The court also certified under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3) that an appeal from the order would not be taken in good faith. It therefore denied Plaintiff permission to appeal without paying the filing fee. The opinion does not address the merits of the underlying claims.

Effect

The complaint was dismissed, and the court denied fee-free appellate status. The order does not state whether Plaintiff may file another complaint or otherwise describe the effect of the dismissal on any future filing.

The authoritative version

Read the full 1-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.

Open opinion PDF →
Summary written with AI assistance. See how summaries are made. Spot something wrong? Tell us.