Feliz v. Colorado TB, LLC
- Vyskocil
- 1:22-cv-04416
- U.S. District Court · Southern District of New York
- 1
In Feliz v. Colorado TB, Judge Vyskocil discontinued the case after a settlement in principle, allowing restoration by August 20, 2022.
Roberta Feliz, Colorado TB, LLC, and the other people Feliz sought to represent.
What happened
In Feliz v. Colorado TB, LLC, Roberta Feliz told the court that the parties had reached a settlement in principle. The opinion does not describe the underlying claims or the settlement’s terms.
The court discontinued the case without costs to either party and without prejudice to restoring it to the court’s calendar if an application was made by August 20, 2022. If no application was made by that date, the dismissal would be with prejudice. The court also postponed all other dates and deadlines.
Judge Mary Kay Vyskocil entered the order on July 20, 2022. This was a procedural disposition based on the reported settlement, not a decision on the underlying claims.
The detailed version
- Feliz v. Colorado TB, LLC · No. 1:22-cv-04416
- Vyskocil
- July 20, 2022
Background
Roberta Feliz, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, was the plaintiff. Colorado TB, LLC, was the defendant. The opinion states that the court received a letter from Feliz saying that the parties had reached a settlement in principle. It does not state the claims asserted or provide the settlement terms.
Court’s Action
The court ordered that the case be discontinued without costs to any party. The discontinuance was without prejudice to restoring the case to the court’s calendar if an application to restore it was made by August 20, 2022. The order further states that if no application was made by that date, the dismissal of the action would be with prejudice, meaning the action could not be reopened through that restoration procedure. All other dates and deadlines were postponed without a new date.
Disposition
Judge Mary Kay Vyskocil entered an order of dismissal on July 20, 2022. The court did not decide the underlying legal claims; it discontinued the case based on the parties’ reported settlement in principle, subject to the stated deadline for seeking restoration.
Read the full 1-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.