Court, Explained
U.S. Federal District Courts
←Back to docket
S.D.N.Y.Procedural orderFiled July 21, 2022

Olibares v. MK Cuisine Global LLC

Judge
Vernon Broderick
Docket
1:21-cv-10694
Court
U.S. District Court · Southern District of New York
Pages
2
FlsaCivil Procedure
In one sentence

In Olibares v. MK Cuisine Global, Judge Broderick ordered the parties to submit their wage settlement for fairness review.

Who this affects

The plaintiffs and defendants in the FLSA case were required to submit the settlement terms, an explanatory joint letter, and, if applicable, evidence supporting attorney’s fees.

What happened

In Olibares v. MK Cuisine Global, the parties told the court that they had reached a settlement of the workers’ wage claims under the Fair Labor Standards Act, a federal wage law.

The court said such claims cannot be privately settled with prejudice without approval from the court or the Labor Department. It must decide whether the settlement is fair and reasonable, including by considering the possible recovery, litigation burdens and risks, lawyers’ negotiations, and possible fraud or collusion.

Judge Vernon S. Broderick ordered the parties to provide the settlement terms within 30 days, along with a joint letter of no more than five pages explaining why the agreement is fair and reasonable. If the agreement includes lawyers’ fees, they must also submit records supporting those fees. The order did not approve the settlement.

The detailed version

For law students, journalists, and other readers who want the full reasoning

Case
Olibares v. MK Cuisine Global LLC · No. 1:21-cv-10694
Judge
Vernon Broderick
Date
July 21, 2022

Background

The court was advised that the parties had reached a settlement in this Fair Labor Standards Act (FLSA) case. The opinion does not state the settlement amount or provide the settlement’s other terms.

Settlement-review standard

The court explained that parties generally may not privately settle FLSA claims with prejudice without approval from the district court or the Department of Labor. The court must be satisfied that the settlement is fair and reasonable. It must consider the total circumstances, including:

- the plaintiff’s possible recovery; - the burdens and expenses the settlement would avoid in proving the claims and defenses; - the seriousness of the litigation risks; - whether experienced counsel negotiated the agreement at arm’s length; and - the possibility of fraud or collusion.

If the settlement includes an award of attorney’s fees, the court must separately assess whether those fees are reasonable. Counsel must provide a factual basis for the requested award, including contemporaneous billing records showing each attorney’s date of work, hours spent, and the nature of the work.

Order

Judge Vernon S. Broderick ordered the parties to provide the settlement terms within 30 days so the court could determine whether they complied with the FLSA and reflected a reasonable compromise of disputed issues. The parties also had to submit a joint letter of no more than five pages explaining why they believed the settlement was fair and reasonable, including information about the five identified factors. If the agreement included attorney’s fees, the parties had to submit supporting evidence. The order did not approve or reject the settlement.

The authoritative version

Read the full 2-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.

Open opinion PDF →
Summary written with AI assistance. See how summaries are made. Spot something wrong? Tell us.