Court, Explained
U.S. Federal District Courts
←Back to docket
S.D.N.Y.Substantive rulingFiled July 22, 2022

Jackson v. Kijakazi, Commissioner of Social Security

Judge
Gregory Woods
Docket
1:21-cv-00978
Court
U.S. District Court · Southern District of New York
Pages
2
Social SecurityCivil Procedure
In one sentence

Jackson v. Kijakazi: Judge Woods granted Jackson’s motion, denied the Commissioner’s motion, and remanded the Social Security case for further proceedings.

Who this affects

Janet Jackson and the Commissioner of Social Security; the case was sent back to the Commissioner for further administrative proceedings.

What happened

Jackson v. Kijakazi concerned a challenge to a Social Security decision. Magistrate Judge Stewart D. Aaron recommended granting Janet Jackson’s request for judgment based on the court filings, denying the Commissioner’s opposing request, and sending the case back for further proceedings.

No party filed a timely objection to the recommendation. The district court therefore reviewed it for clear error and found none.

Judge Gregory H. Woods adopted the recommendation in full, granted Jackson’s motion, denied the Commissioner’s cross-motion, and remanded the case to the Commissioner of Social Security for further administrative proceedings. The court also closed the case.

The detailed version

For law students, journalists, and other readers who want the full reasoning

Case
Jackson v. Kijakazi, Commissioner of Social Security · No. 1:21-cv-00978
Judge
Gregory Woods
Date
July 22, 2022

Background

On July 7, 2022, Magistrate Judge Stewart D. Aaron issued a Report and Recommendation recommending that the court grant Janet Jackson’s motion for judgment on the pleadings, deny the Commissioner’s cross-motion, and remand the case for further administrative proceedings. The order states that the Report and Recommendation described the case’s facts and procedural history in detail, but this order does not repeat them.

Review of the Recommendation

The parties had fourteen days to submit specific written objections. No objection was filed within that period. Judge Woods reviewed the unchallenged recommendation for clear error and found none. After reviewing the record, the parties’ submissions concerning the motions, and the Report and Recommendation, the court agreed with Judge Aaron’s conclusions and adopted the recommendation in its entirety.

Ruling

The court granted Jackson’s motion for judgment on the pleadings and denied the Commissioner’s cross-motion for judgment on the pleadings. It remanded the case to the Commissioner of Social Security for further administrative proceedings consistent with the opinion. The Clerk of Court was directed to terminate the two pending motions and close the case.

The authoritative version

Read the full 2-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.

Open opinion PDF →
Summary written with AI assistance. See how summaries are made. Spot something wrong? Tell us.