Court, Explained
U.S. Federal District Courts
←Back to docket
S.D.N.Y.Procedural orderFiled July 26, 2022

Alexander v. Almonte

Judge
Andrew Carter
Docket
1:21-cv-11206
Court
U.S. District Court · Southern District of New York
Pages
1
Civil ProcedureContract
In one sentence

In Ramon Alexander v. Wilfredo Almonte, Judge Carter approved the parties’ settlement and dismissed the case with prejudice.

Who this affects

Ramon Alexander and Wilfredo Almonte, et al.; the court-approved settlement resolved the entire case, which was dismissed with prejudice.

What happened

Ramon Alexander v. Wilfredo Almonte involved the court’s review of a settlement agreement and plaintiff’s counsel’s time records. The opinion does not describe the underlying claims or the settlement’s specific terms.

The court reviewed the records and agreement as required by the Second Circuit’s settlement-review rule in Cheeks v. Freeport Pancake House, Inc. It found the settlement fair and reasonable and approved it.

Judge Andrew L. Carter, Jr. ordered the entire case dismissed with prejudice, without fees or costs except as the parties agreed. The order was entered on July 26, 2022.

The detailed version

For law students, journalists, and other readers who want the full reasoning

Case
Alexander v. Almonte · No. 1:21-cv-11206
Judge
Andrew Carter
Date
July 26, 2022

Background

The court received an email from Ramon Alexander’s counsel concerning counsel’s time records. The court also reviewed the parties’ settlement agreement. The opinion does not identify the underlying claims or provide the agreement’s specific terms.

Court’s analysis

Under Cheeks v. Freeport Pancake House, Inc., 796 F.3d 199 (2d Cir. 2015), the court reviewed the settlement to determine whether it was fair and reasonable. The court stated that both the time records and settlement agreement satisfied that standard.

Ruling

Judge Andrew L. Carter, Jr. approved the settlement. The court ordered that the entire case be dismissed with prejudice, meaning the case cannot be refiled, without fees or costs except as agreed to by the parties.

The authoritative version

Read the full 1-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.

Open opinion PDF →
Summary written with AI assistance. See how summaries are made. Spot something wrong? Tell us.