Brunson-Malone v. United States
- Lewis Kaplan
- 1:21-cv-09665
- U.S. District Court · Southern District of New York
- 2
In Brunson-Malone v. United States, Judge Wang granted a 90-day stay while Brunson-Malone pursued a possible workers’ compensation claim.
The stay affects Tanisha Brunson-Malone and the United States in the Federal Tort Claims Act case; it gives Brunson-Malone additional time to file a workers’ compensation claim and obtain a coverage decision.
What happened
Brunson-Malone v. United States concerns an alleged slip and fall at a Department of Veterans Affairs hospital. Brunson-Malone brought a claim under the Federal Tort Claims Act, but the Department of Labor preliminarily determined that she might instead be covered by the Federal Employees’ Compensation Act because she was working on a VA-supervised research project.
The parties asked the court to extend an existing stay so Brunson-Malone could file a workers’ compensation claim with the Department of Labor and obtain a final coverage decision. She had not yet filed that claim, although her lawyer indicated that she planned to do so. The Government stated that it would seek dismissal for failure to prosecute if she did not file the claim by October 24, 2022.
Judge Ona T. Wang granted the application. The case was stayed until October 24, 2022, and the parties were ordered to file a joint status letter by October 21, 2022.
The detailed version
- Brunson-Malone v. United States · No. 1:21-cv-09665
- Lewis Kaplan
- July 27, 2022
Background
Tanisha Brunson-Malone brought this Federal Tort Claims Act case against the United States based on an alleged slip and fall at the James J. Peters VA Hospital in the Bronx. At the time of the alleged incident, she was a Department of Veterans Affairs “Without Compensation” appointee working on a VA-supervised medical research project at the hospital.
The Department of Labor’s Office of Workers’ Compensation Programs had preliminarily determined that Brunson-Malone might be covered under the Federal Employees’ Compensation Act for injuries resulting from the incident. The Government stated that, if she was covered by that law, the Federal Employees’ Compensation Act would prevent her from bringing the Federal Tort Claims Act action.
Request for an Additional Stay
The parties had previously agreed to stay the case for 90 days so Brunson-Malone could file a workers’ compensation claim and the Department of Labor could make a final determination about her coverage. In their July 25, 2022 status update, the parties reported that Brunson-Malone had not yet filed the claim, but her counsel had indicated that she planned to do so. They jointly requested another 90-day stay, through October 24, 2022.
The Government stated that, if Brunson-Malone did not file the workers’ compensation claim by October 24, 2022, it would move to dismiss the case for failure to prosecute under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(b).
Ruling
Judge Ona T. Wang granted the application. The case was stayed until October 24, 2022, and the parties were ordered to file a joint status letter by October 21, 2022. The order did not decide whether Brunson-Malone was covered by the Federal Employees’ Compensation Act or whether her Federal Tort Claims Act claim could proceed.
Read the full 2-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.