Spin Master Ltd. and Spin Master Toys UK Limited v. Chakaruna4169 et.al.
- John Cronan
- 1:22-cv-00553
- U.S. District Court · Southern District of New York
- 2
In Spin Master Ltd. v. chakaruna4169, Judge Cronan granted Plaintiffs’ request for a one-week extension to file a supplemental brief.
The plaintiffs received additional time to file their supplemental brief. The remaining defendants were identified by the plaintiffs as being in default.
What happened
In Spin Master Ltd. and Spin Master Toys UK Limited v. chakaruna4169 et al., the plaintiffs asked for more time to file a supplemental brief. The existing deadline was August 4, 2022, and they requested an extension until August 11, 2022.
The plaintiffs said they needed additional time to analyze a recent opinion and compare it with other legal authority and the facts of this case. They also said this was their first extension request and that the remaining defendants were in default, so they did not seek their consent.
Judge John P. Cronan granted the request. He directed the plaintiffs to file the supplemental brief by August 11, 2022, and directed the Clerk of Court to close the motion listed at Docket Number 41.
The detailed version
- Spin Master Ltd. and Spin Master Toys UK Limited v. Chakaruna4169 et.al. · No. 1:22-cv-00553
- John Cronan
- July 29, 2022
Background
On July 27, 2022, the Court ordered Plaintiffs Spin Master Ltd. and Spin Master Toys UK Limited to file a supplemental brief by August 4, 2022.
Request
Plaintiffs requested a one-week extension, through August 11, 2022. They said they needed additional time to analyze a July 21, 2022 opinion in a related matter and reconcile that opinion with contrary authority and the facts of this case. Plaintiffs stated that this was their first request for an extension. They also stated that all remaining defendants were in default and that, for that reason, they did not seek the defendants’ consent.
Ruling
Judge John P. Cronan granted the request. The Court directed Plaintiffs to file the supplemental brief by August 11, 2022. It also directed the Clerk of Court to close the motion pending at Docket Number 41. This order addressed only the filing deadline and did not decide the underlying claims described in the opinion text.
Read the full 2-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.