Court, Explained
U.S. Federal District Courts
←Back to docket
S.D.N.Y.Procedural orderFiled July 29, 2022

Vasquetelles v. LHCSA Home Health Holdings, LLC

Judge
Andrew Carter
Docket
1:22-cv-03525
Court
U.S. District Court · Southern District of New York
Pages
1
Civil Procedure
In one sentence

In Vasquetelles v. LHCSA Home Health Holdings, LLC, Judge Cott ordered the parties to seek approval of their reported settlement.

Who this affects

The parties to the case, Ian Vasquetelles and LHCSA Home Health Holdings, LLC, et al., were directed to submit a joint settlement-approval request and agreement.

What happened

In Vasquetelles v. LHCSA Home Health Holdings, LLC, the parties reported that they had reached a settlement covering all issues, although the scheduled mediation did not occur.

The court ordered the parties to file a joint request and their settlement agreement by August 29, 2022. The request must explain why the settlement is fair and reasonable and follows the required appellate standards.

United States Magistrate Judge James L. Cott issued the order on July 29, 2022. The parties were told to submit the settlement papers to Judge Andrew Carter unless they agreed to let Judge Cott review them.

The detailed version

For law students, journalists, and other readers who want the full reasoning

Case
Vasquetelles v. LHCSA Home Health Holdings, LLC · No. 1:22-cv-03525
Judge
Andrew Carter
Date
July 29, 2022

Background

The docket showed that a mediator filed a final report on July 28, 2022. The report stated that mediation had not been held because the parties represented that they had reached a settlement on all issues.

Order

Magistrate Judge James L. Cott ordered the parties to file a joint letter motion and their settlement agreement by August 29, 2022, asking the court to approve the settlement. The letter must explain why the proposed settlement is fair and reasonable and complies with the Second Circuit’s requirements in Cheeks v. Freeport Pancake House, Inc.

The parties were directed to submit the settlement papers to Judge Andrew Carter, unless they agreed to consent to Magistrate Judge Cott’s authority to review the settlement under 28 U.S.C. § 636(c). The opinion does not approve the settlement or decide the underlying claims.

The authoritative version

Read the full 1-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.

Open opinion PDF →
Summary written with AI assistance. See how summaries are made. Spot something wrong? Tell us.