Miranda v. Lexington United LLC
- Robert Lehrburger
- 1:20-cv-10890
- U.S. District Court · Southern District of New York
- 2
In Miranda v. Lexington United LLC, Judge Lehrburger approved the parties’ settlement and dismissed the Fair Labor Standards Act case with prejudice.
Roberto Miranda and Lexington United LLC and the other defendants were affected: the court approved their settlement and dismissed the case in its entirety with prejudice.
What happened
Roberto Miranda sued Lexington United LLC and other defendants for damages under the Fair Labor Standards Act and New York Labor Law. The parties asked the court to approve their settlement after participating in court-ordered mediation.
The court reviewed the settlement and considered the risks and costs of continuing the case, the possible recovery, the negotiation process, attorney’s fees, and the possibility of fraud or collusion. It found the agreement fair and reasonable, noting that it had no confidentiality provision, included reasonable attorney’s fees, and contained a non-disparagement provision with appropriate exceptions.
Judge Robert W. Lehrburger approved the settlement and dismissed and discontinued the case in its entirety with prejudice, without costs or fees to any party except as provided in the settlement agreement. The court also directed the Clerk of Court to terminate all motions and deadlines and close the case.
The detailed version
- Miranda v. Lexington United LLC · No. 1:20-cv-10890
- Robert Lehrburger
- July 29, 2022
Background
Roberto Miranda brought an action for damages under the Fair Labor Standards Act, a federal wage-and-hour law, and the New York Labor Law against Lexington United LLC and other defendants. The parties jointly asked the court to approve a fully executed settlement agreement submitted on July 22, 2022.
Settlement Review
Because federal courts must review settlements in Fair Labor Standards Act cases, the court examined whether the agreement was fair and reasonable and resulted from arm’s-length negotiations rather than employer overreaching. The parties reached their agreement after court-ordered mediation. The court reviewed the parties’ letter and settlement agreement and considered, among other things, prior proceedings, the risks, burdens, and costs of continuing the case, the possible recovery, the bargaining process, attorney’s fees, and the possibility of fraud or collusion.
The court noted that the agreement contained no confidentiality provision, that the attorney’s fees were within a fair and reasonable range, and that the non-disparagement provision included appropriate exceptions. The court found the settlement fair and reasonable and approved it.
Disposition
The court stated that the case had been resolved by settlement and dismissed and discontinued it in its entirety, with prejudice, without costs or fees to any party except as provided in the settlement agreement. The Clerk of Court was directed to terminate all motions and deadlines and close the case.
Read the full 2-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.