Court, Explained
U.S. Federal District Courts
←Back to docket
S.D.N.Y.Procedural orderFiled July 29, 2022

P.M. v. Joyce

Judge
Valerie Caproni
Docket
1:22-cv-06321
Court
U.S. District Court · Southern District of New York
Pages
2
Civil ProcedureHabeasImmigration
In one sentence

In P.M. v. Joyce, Judge Caproni granted P.M.’s application to file a psychological evaluation under seal.

Who this affects

P.M., whose psychological evaluation may be filed under seal and kept from public view; the public’s access to that exhibit is limited.

What happened

P.M. v. Joyce involved P.M.’s pending petition asking for a court order concerning his detention. P.M.’s lawyers asked to submit one additional exhibit under seal.

The exhibit was a twelve-page psychological evaluation containing sensitive medical and personal information, including mental-health diagnoses and treatment recommendations. The application also said the evaluation discussed information related to P.M.’s asylum claim and that Respondents’ lawyer consented to sealing.

Judge Valerie Caproni granted the application. The order therefore allowed the exhibit to be filed under seal and shielded from public view.

The detailed version

For law students, journalists, and other readers who want the full reasoning

Case
P.M. v. Joyce · No. 1:22-cv-06321
Judge
Valerie Caproni
Date
July 29, 2022

Background

P.M. had a pending petition for a writ of habeas corpus, a request for a court order addressing allegedly unlawful detention. P.M.’s attorneys submitted an application asking for permission to file one additional exhibit under seal. The exhibit was identified as a psychological evaluation prepared by Diana Franco, a licensed clinical social worker. The application stated that counsel for Respondents consented to sealing.

Application to Seal

The application stated that the twelve-page evaluation contained highly sensitive personal and medical information, including mental-health diagnoses and treatment recommendations. It also contained a narrative about information related to P.M.’s asylum claim. P.M.’s attorneys argued that the privacy and safety concerns associated with this information outweighed the public’s usual right to inspect court records and that filing the exhibit under seal was narrowly tailored to protect that information.

Ruling

The court’s order states: “Application GRANTED.” Judge Valerie Caproni therefore allowed P.M. to file the psychological evaluation under seal. The opinion text does not provide separate reasoning beyond the application’s arguments and does not state any ruling on the underlying habeas petition.

The authoritative version

Read the full 2-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.

Open opinion PDF →
Summary written with AI assistance. See how summaries are made. Spot something wrong? Tell us.