Court, Explained
U.S. Federal District Courts
←Back to docket
S.D.N.Y.Procedural orderFiled Aug. 1, 2022

Fierro v. The City of New York, Department of Education

Judge
Gregory Woods
Docket
1:20-cv-09966
Court
U.S. District Court · Southern District of New York
Pages
10
DiscoveryCivil Procedure
In one sentence

In Fierro v. The City of New York, Department of Education, Judge Woods entered a stipulated protective order governing confidential discovery materials.

Who this affects

Joseph Fierro, the City of New York, the Department of Education, their counsel and other persons covered by the order, and people who receive discovery material designated as confidential.

What happened

Fierro v. The City of New York, Department of Education concerns the parties’ agreed rules for handling confidential information during discovery. The parties asked the court to issue an order under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 26(c).

The order allows certain financial, employment-related, application, personal, and other court-designated information to be marked confidential. It limits disclosure, requires certain recipients to sign nondisclosure agreements, establishes procedures for court filings and objections, and restricts use of the information to this case and related appeals.

Judge Woods ordered the parties and other people covered by the order to follow these requirements, subject to contempt. The order does not decide the underlying claims or determine that any particular discovery material is confidential.

The detailed version

For law students, journalists, and other readers who want the full reasoning

Case
Fierro v. The City of New York, Department of Education · No. 1:20-cv-09966
Judge
Gregory Woods
Date
Aug. 1, 2022

Nature of the order

The parties jointly requested a confidentiality agreement and protective order under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 26(c). The court found good cause for an appropriately tailored order governing the pretrial phase of the action and ordered the parties and other covered persons to follow it.

Material that may be designated confidential

A producing party may designate as confidential only material it reasonably and in good faith believes includes:

- Previously undisclosed financial information, such as profitability reports or estimates, fees, royalty rates, payments, sales reports, and margins; - Documents and information in personnel, disciplinary, labor-relations, recruitment, or Equal Employment Opportunity files concerning non-party current or former Department of Education employees; - Application materials submitted by non-party current or former Department of Education employees; - Personal or intimate information about an individual; or - Another category that the court later gives confidential status.

The order provides procedures for marking confidential portions of documents and producing redacted copies. Deposition exhibits or transcript portions may be designated during the deposition or within 30 days afterward. During that 30-day period, the entire deposition transcript must be treated as confidential. A producing party may also later designate material that was initially produced without a confidentiality designation and must provide replacement versions within two business days after giving notice.

Limits on disclosure and use

Confidential discovery material may be disclosed only to listed categories of people, including the parties, insurers and their counsel, counsel retained for the action, certain vendors and service providers, mediators or arbitrators, document authors and recipients, potential witnesses, experts and other specialized advisers, deposition stenographers, and the court and its personnel. Witnesses, experts, mediators, and arbitrators must first receive the order and sign the required nondisclosure agreement. Counsel must retain those signed agreements and produce them to opposing counsel at specified times.

Recipients may use confidential discovery material only to prosecute or defend this action and appeals from it, not for another purpose or litigation. The order does not restrict a party’s rights concerning its own documents or information. It also permits production in response to a lawful subpoena or other compulsory process, subject to notice to the producing party when reasonably possible and, if time permits, at least 10 days before disclosure.

Court filings, objections, and enforcement

A party filing confidential discovery material or a filing that reveals it must publicly file a redacted copy and seek permission to file an unredacted copy under seal. The order states that the court has not determined that any designated material is confidential and retains discretion over whether to give it confidential treatment. It also warns that material introduced at trial is unlikely to remain sealed unless the required findings are made.

A party may object to a confidentiality designation before trial by giving written notice with particularized grounds. A party may likewise request additional disclosure limits, such as attorneys’ eyes only treatment in extraordinary circumstances. Unresolved disputes must be presented to the court under its individual practices.

Within 60 days after final disposition of the action, including appeals, recipients generally must return or destroy confidential discovery material and certify that they have kept no copies or summaries. Attorneys specifically retained for the action may keep certain archival materials, which remain subject to the order. The order survives termination of the litigation, and the court retains jurisdiction as needed to enforce it or impose contempt sanctions.

Disposition and significance

Judge Woods entered the stipulated protective order. It governs discovery confidentiality and does not resolve the merits, admissibility, discovery objections, or confidentiality status of any particular material.

The authoritative version

Read the full 10-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.

Open opinion PDF →
Summary written with AI assistance. See how summaries are made. Spot something wrong? Tell us.