Court, Explained
U.S. Federal District Courts
←Back to docket
S.D.N.Y.Procedural orderFiled Aug. 3, 2022

Capri Sun GmbH v. American Beverage Corporation

Judge
Paul Engelmayer
Docket
1:19-cv-01422
Court
U.S. District Court · Southern District of New York
Pages
3
Civil ProcedureDiscovery
In one sentence

In Capri Sun v. American Beverage, Judge Engelmayer granted American Beverage’s request to redact its opposition and seal supporting exhibits containing confidential business information.

Who this affects

American Beverage Corporation, Capri Sun GmbH, and third parties whose confidential business information appears in the requested materials.

What happened

In Capri Sun GmbH v. American Beverage Corporation, American Beverage asked the court to seal Exhibits 3–7 and 13–15 supporting its opposition to Capri Sun’s motions in limine. It also asked to redact limited portions of that opposition.

American Beverage said the materials included confidential business communications, marketing and product information, customer information, competitive analysis, and deposition excerpts discussing such information. It argued that disclosure could commercially or competitively disadvantage Capri Sun, third parties, or the parties that produced the documents.

Judge Paul A. Engelmayer granted the request. The order therefore allowed the specified exhibits to be filed under seal and permitted the requested redactions.

The detailed version

For law students, journalists, and other readers who want the full reasoning

Case
Capri Sun GmbH v. American Beverage Corporation · No. 1:19-cv-01422
Judge
Paul Engelmayer
Date
Aug. 3, 2022

Background

American Beverage Corporation asked the court to seal Exhibits 3–7 and 13–15 attached to the declaration supporting its opposition to Capri Sun GmbH’s motions in limine. It also requested permission to file that opposition with limited redactions.

The request relied on a protective order entered on July 8, 2019. That order allowed discovery materials to be designated as “CONFIDENTIAL” or “OUTSIDE COUNSEL’S EYES ONLY” and required a party seeking to file protected material to ask the court to place the relevant portions under seal.

Reasons for the Request

American Beverage represented that the exhibits were designated confidential under the protective order. It stated that Exhibits 3–6 and most excerpts in Exhibit 7 had previously been sealed under the court’s July 14, 2021 order. American Beverage further represented that Exhibits 3–6 and 13–15 contained internal and commercially sensitive communications concerning marketing, existing and new products, current or potential customers, and confidential competitive analysis. It said Exhibit 7 contained deposition excerpts discussing those subjects.

American Beverage also sought redactions in its opposition because the challenged portions directly quoted or relied on the sealed documents or on materials involving confidential and commercially sensitive business information. It argued that public disclosure could commercially or competitively disadvantage Capri Sun or third parties.

Ruling

Judge Paul A. Engelmayer granted the request. The order allowed American Beverage to redact the specified portions of its opposition and to file the identified supporting exhibits under seal.

The authoritative version

Read the full 3-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.

Open opinion PDF →
Summary written with AI assistance. See how summaries are made. Spot something wrong? Tell us.