Court, Explained
U.S. Federal District Courts
←Back to docket
S.D.N.Y.Procedural orderFiled Aug. 8, 2022

Clark v. The State of New York

Judge
Kenneth Karas
Docket
7:22-cv-06635
Court
U.S. District Court · Southern District of New York
Pages
2
HabeasPro SeCivil Procedure
In one sentence

In Clark v. The State of New York, Chief Judge Swain ordered payment or an application to proceed without fees within 30 days.

Who this affects

Eric Wade Clark, who must either pay the $5 filing fee or submit a signed application to proceed without prepaying fees within 30 days; the action may be dismissed if he does not comply.

What happened

Clark filed a petition for a writ of habeas corpus without paying the filing fee or submitting an application to proceed without paying fees. The opinion identifies Clark as representing himself.

The court ordered Clark, within 30 days, either to pay the $5 filing fee or submit a signed application to proceed without prepaying fees. No response from the respondents was required at that time.

The court stated that the case would be processed if Clark complied and would be dismissed if he did not. Chief Judge Laura Taylor Swain also denied fee-free status for any appeal from this order because the appeal would not be taken in good faith.

The detailed version

For law students, journalists, and other readers who want the full reasoning

Case
Clark v. The State of New York · No. 7:22-cv-06635
Judge
Kenneth Karas
Date
Aug. 8, 2022

Background

Eric Wade Clark, who was proceeding without a lawyer, filed a petition for a writ of habeas corpus against The State of New York and other respondents. He submitted the petition without the required $5 filing fee and without an application to proceed without prepaying court fees.

Order

The court explained that a habeas petitioner must either pay the filing fee or submit a signed application requesting permission to proceed without prepaying fees. The court gave Clark 30 days from the date of the order to do one of those two things. Any application was required to identify docket number 22-CV-6635 (LTS). The court stated that, if it granted the application, Clark could proceed without prepaying fees.

The court also stated that no answer from the respondents was required at that time. If Clark complied, the case would be processed under the Clerk’s Office procedures. If he failed to comply within the permitted time, the action would be dismissed.

Appeal provision and disposition

The order did not decide the underlying habeas petition. Chief United States District Judge Laura Taylor Swain certified that any appeal from the order would not be taken in good faith and denied permission to proceed without prepaying fees for purposes of an appeal.

The authoritative version

Read the full 2-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.

Open opinion PDF →
Summary written with AI assistance. See how summaries are made. Spot something wrong? Tell us.