Court, Explained
U.S. Federal District Courts
←Back to docket
S.D.N.Y.Procedural orderFiled Aug. 8, 2022

Tatacoya Flores v. 153 J and J Food Market Corp.

Judge
Ronnie Abrams
Docket
1:21-cv-09917
Court
U.S. District Court · Southern District of New York
Pages
1
Civil ProcedureContract
In one sentence

Tatacoya Flores v. 153 JAND J Food Market Corp.: Judge Abrams ordered the parties to file dismissal papers or a status update after approving their settlement.

Who this affects

Jose Antonio Tatacoya Flores, 153 JAND J Food Market Corp., and Julian Ramos were affected by the order requiring the parties to file a stipulation of dismissal or a status update.

What happened

In Tatacoya Flores v. 153 JAND J Food Market Corp., the court had approved the parties’ settlement agreement on July 5, 2022, and directed them to submit paperwork dismissing the case.

The parties had not filed that paperwork by the time of this order. The court gave them until August 15, 2022, to file either a dismissal agreement or a status update.

Judge Ronnie Abrams issued the order on August 8, 2022. The order required the parties to make one of those filings but did not state that the case was dismissed.

The detailed version

For law students, journalists, and other readers who want the full reasoning

Case
Tatacoya Flores v. 153 J and J Food Market Corp. · No. 1:21-cv-09917
Judge
Ronnie Abrams
Date
Aug. 8, 2022

Background

On July 5, 2022, the court approved the parties’ settlement agreement under a cited appellate decision concerning judicial review of settlements in certain wage cases. The court directed the parties to file an agreement formally ending the case for the court’s approval.

Order

The parties had not filed the required dismissal agreement. The court ordered them to file either a stipulation of dismissal or a status update by August 15, 2022.

Effect

The order addressed the parties’ failure to submit the required filing after settlement approval. It did not state that the case was dismissed or describe the settlement’s terms.

The authoritative version

Read the full 1-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.

Open opinion PDF →
Summary written with AI assistance. See how summaries are made. Spot something wrong? Tell us.