Court, Explained
U.S. Federal District Courts
←Back to docket
S.D.N.Y.Procedural orderFiled Aug. 8, 2022

Jimenez v. Branded Bills LLC

Judge
Vyskocil
Docket
1:22-cv-04289
Court
U.S. District Court · Southern District of New York
Pages
1
Civil ProcedureClass Action
In one sentence

In Jimenez v. Branded Bills, Judge Vyskocil discontinued the action after a settlement in principle, with dismissal becoming with prejudice if no restoration request came by September 8, 2022.

Who this affects

Vanessa Jimenez and Branded Bills LLC are directly affected. The action was also brought on behalf of all others similarly situated, but the opinion does not state that a class was certified.

What happened

In Jimenez v. Branded Bills LLC, Vanessa Jimenez told the court that she and Branded Bills LLC had reached a settlement in principle. She had brought the action individually and on behalf of others similarly situated.

The court discontinued the action without costs to either party and without prejudice to restoring it to the court’s calendar if the parties could not put their settlement in writing. Any application to restore the action had to be made by September 8, 2022. If no application was made by then, the dismissal would be with prejudice.

Judge Mary Kay Vyskocil issued the order on August 8, 2022. The opinion does not say whether the settlement was finalized or whether any class was certified.

The detailed version

For law students, journalists, and other readers who want the full reasoning

Case
Jimenez v. Branded Bills LLC · No. 1:22-cv-04289
Judge
Vyskocil
Date
Aug. 8, 2022

Background

Vanessa Jimenez sued Branded Bills LLC individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated. The opinion states that Jimenez filed a letter informing the court that the parties had reached a settlement in principle.

Court’s Order

The court ordered that the action be discontinued without costs to any party. The discontinuance was without prejudice to restoring the action to the court’s calendar if the parties were unable to memorialize their settlement in writing, provided that an application to restore the action was made by September 8, 2022.

The court further stated that if no application to restore the action was made by that date, the dismissal of the action would be with prejudice, meaning the action could not be brought again. The opinion does not state whether the settlement was finalized or whether a class was certified.

Disposition

The action was discontinued under the stated conditions. Judge Mary Kay Vyskocil signed the order on August 8, 2022.

The authoritative version

Read the full 1-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.

Open opinion PDF →
Summary written with AI assistance. See how summaries are made. Spot something wrong? Tell us.