Court, Explained
U.S. Federal District Courts
←Back to docket
S.D.N.Y.Substantive rulingFiled Aug. 8, 2022

Trustees Of The New York City District Council Of Carpenters Pension Fund v…

Full caption

Trustees Of The New York City District Council Of Carpenters Pension Fund, Welfare Fund, Annuity Fund, and Apprenticeship, Journeyman Retraining, Educational and Industry Fund v. Northe Group, Inc.

Judge
Vernon Broderick
Docket
1:21-cv-00719
Court
U.S. District Court · Southern District of New York
Pages
2
Summary JudgmentCivil Procedure
In one sentence

Trustees of the New York City District Council of Carpenters v. Northe Group, Inc.: Judge Broderick adopted the recommendation, granted petitioners’ summary-judgment motion, and ordered judgment for $10,059.14.

Who this affects

The petitioners, the Trustees of the New York City District Council of Carpenters Pension Fund, Welfare Fund, Annuity Fund, and Apprenticeship, Journeyman Retraining, Educational and Industry Fund, received a judgment in their favor for $10,059.14. The action against Northe Group, Inc. was terminated.

What happened

In Trustees of the New York City District Council of Carpenters v. Northe Group, Inc., a magistrate judge recommended granting the petitioners’ motion for summary judgment and awarding them $10,059.14.

Neither party objected to the recommendation or requested more time to do so. The district court therefore reviewed it for clear error and found none.

Judge Vernon S. Broderick adopted the recommendation, directed the Clerk of Court to enter judgment under its terms, and ordered the action terminated.

The detailed version

For law students, journalists, and other readers who want the full reasoning

Case
Trustees Of The New York City District Council Of Carpenters Pension Fund v… · No. 1:21-cv-00719
Judge
Vernon Broderick
Date
Aug. 8, 2022

Background

The court considered Magistrate Judge Gabriel W. Gorenstein’s Report and Recommendation, which recommended granting the petitioners’ motion for summary judgment and awarding judgment in their favor for $10,059.14.

Review of the Recommendation

No party filed objections or requested additional time to object. Under the governing procedure, Judge Broderick reviewed the Report and Recommendation for clear error. He found no clear error after reviewing the report.

Ruling

Judge Broderick adopted the Report and Recommendation. He directed the Clerk of Court to enter judgment according to its terms and to terminate the action.

The authoritative version

Read the full 2-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.

Open opinion PDF →
Summary written with AI assistance. See how summaries are made. Spot something wrong? Tell us.