Crumwell v. East Coast Flightcraft Inc.
- Vyskocil
- 1:22-cv-02053
- U.S. District Court · Southern District of New York
- 1
In Crumwell v. East Coast Flightcraft, Judge Vyskocil discontinued the action after a settlement in principle, subject to a restoration deadline.
Denise Crumwell and East Coast Flightcraft, Inc.; the action was discontinued based on the parties’ reported settlement in principle.
What happened
In Crumwell v. East Coast Flightcraft, Inc., Denise Crumwell informed the court that the parties had reached a settlement in principle.
The court discontinued the action without costs to either party and allowed it to be restored if the parties could not put their settlement in writing and an application was made by September 20, 2022. If no application was made by that date, the dismissal would be with prejudice.
Judge Mary Kay Vyskocil entered the order on August 9, 2022.
The detailed version
- Crumwell v. East Coast Flightcraft Inc. · No. 1:22-cv-02053
- Vyskocil
- Aug. 9, 2022
Background
The court received a letter from Denise Crumwell stating that the parties had reached a settlement in principle.
Ruling
The court ordered that the action be discontinued without costs to any party and without prejudice to restoring the action to the court’s calendar. Restoration was permitted if the parties were unable to memorialize their settlement in writing and the application to restore the action was made by September 20, 2022. The order stated that if no application was made by that date, the dismissal would be with prejudice.
Effect
The case was discontinued based on the reported settlement, subject to the stated deadline and conditions. The opinion does not describe the underlying claims or the settlement’s terms.
Read the full 1-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.