Court, Explained
U.S. Federal District Courts
←Back to docket
S.D.N.Y.Procedural orderFiled Aug. 9, 2022

In Re: LATAM Airlines Group S.A.

Judge
Denise Cote
Docket
1:22-cv-05891
Court
U.S. District Court · Southern District of New York
Pages
2
Civil ProcedureBankruptcy
In one sentence

In re LATAM Airlines Group S.A., Judge Cote granted permission to file a redacted appendix containing confidential business information.

Who this affects

LATAM Airlines Group S.A. and its affiliated debtors and debtors-in-possession were permitted to file a redacted supplemental appendix; access to the information redacted from that appendix is restricted from public disclosure.

What happened

In re LATAM Airlines Group S.A. involved a request by LATAM Airlines Group S.A. and affiliated debtors to file a redacted appendix in an appeal-related matter.

The appendix included information from the bankruptcy court record that had been designated confidential or highly confidential, including sensitive business, financial, and transaction information. The request stated that the information could cause competitive harm if publicly disclosed.

Judge Denise L. Cote granted the request to file the redacted version of the supplemental appendix. The order did not redact the opposition brief itself.

The detailed version

For law students, journalists, and other readers who want the full reasoning

Case
In Re: LATAM Airlines Group S.A. · No. 1:22-cv-05891
Judge
Denise Cote
Date
Aug. 9, 2022

Background

LATAM Airlines Group S.A. and its affiliated debtors and debtors-in-possession asked the court for authorization to file a redacted version of a supplemental appendix to their brief opposing the appellant's opening brief. They did not ask to redact the opposition brief.

The supplemental appendix contained information from the bankruptcy court record that had been filed under seal or designated confidential or highly confidential under a stipulated protective order. The designations covered nonpublic proprietary, technical, business, financial, and personal information, including material that could create a risk of competitive injury if disclosed.

Ruling

The court granted the request to file the redacted version of the supplemental appendix. The order also reflects that a full, unredacted version had been filed under seal. The opinion text is a letter requesting permission with the court's approval written at the end; it does not provide a separate explanation of the court's reasoning.

The authoritative version

Read the full 2-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.

Open opinion PDF →
Summary written with AI assistance. See how summaries are made. Spot something wrong? Tell us.