Court, Explained
U.S. Federal District Courts
←Back to docket
S.D.N.Y.Procedural orderFiled Aug. 10, 2022

Velasquez v. Dundee LLC

Judge
Vyskocil
Docket
1:21-cv-09387
Court
U.S. District Court · Southern District of New York
Pages
1
Civil ProcedureContract
In one sentence

In Velasquez v. Dundee LLC, Judge Vyskocil discontinued the action after a settlement in principle, allowing restoration by September 10, 2022.

Who this affects

Ricardo Velasquez, Dundee LLC d/b/a Caledonia, and Tal Umatar LLC. The action was discontinued without costs, with possible restoration by September 10, 2022; otherwise, the dismissal would be with prejudice.

What happened

In Velasquez v. Dundee LLC, Ricardo Velasquez told the court that the parties had reached a settlement in principle.

The court discontinued the action without costs to any party and without prejudice to restoring it to the court’s calendar if the parties could not put their settlement in writing.

Judge Vyskocil ordered that any request to restore the case had to be made by September 10, 2022; otherwise, the dismissal would be with prejudice.

The detailed version

For law students, journalists, and other readers who want the full reasoning

Case
Velasquez v. Dundee LLC · No. 1:21-cv-09387
Judge
Vyskocil
Date
Aug. 10, 2022

Background

Ricardo Velasquez informed the court that the parties had reached a settlement in principle. The opinion does not describe the underlying claims or the settlement’s terms.

Ruling

The court ordered that the action be discontinued without costs to any party and without prejudice to restoring the action to the court’s calendar if the parties were unable to memorialize their settlement in writing. The court required any application to restore the action to be made by September 10, 2022. If no application was made by that date, the dismissal would be with prejudice.

Effect

The order ended the action subject to the stated restoration deadline. The opinion does not state whether the parties later completed a written settlement or whether anyone applied to restore the case.

The authoritative version

Read the full 1-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.

Open opinion PDF →
Summary written with AI assistance. See how summaries are made. Spot something wrong? Tell us.