Court, Explained
U.S. Federal District Courts
←Back to docket
S.D.N.Y.Procedural orderFiled Aug. 11, 2022

De Jesus v. P&N Cuisine Inc.

Judge
Ronnie Abrams
Docket
1:20-cv-03619
Court
U.S. District Court · Southern District of New York
Pages
2
EmploymentCivil ProcedureFee Petition
In one sentence

In De Jesus v. P&N Cuisine Inc., Judge Abrams adopted a damages recommendation and entered judgment for plaintiffs against the defaulting defendants.

Who this affects

The order awarded money to Francisco Ayaya De Jesus and Fredy Salustio Flores, individually and on behalf of others similarly situated, and imposed the stated damages, interest, and fees against the defaulting defendants P&N Cuisine Inc. and Nimnual Likituarin.

What happened

In De Jesus v. P&N Cuisine Inc., the court considered a magistrate judge’s recommendation after previously granting in part and denying in part the plaintiffs’ motion for default judgment. The recommendation addressed damages and attorneys’ fees owed by the defaulting defendants.

No party objected to the recommendation. The court found no clear error and adopted it in full, awarding the plaintiffs $135,942.00 in damages, prejudgment interest calculated by the Clerk of Court, and $3,300.00 in attorneys’ fees and costs.

Judge Ronnie Abrams directed the Clerk to enter judgment for the plaintiffs and close the case. The order concerned Francisco Ayaya De Jesus and Fredy Salustio Flores, individually and on behalf of others similarly situated, against P&N Cuisine Inc. and Nimnual Likituarin.

The detailed version

For law students, journalists, and other readers who want the full reasoning

Case
De Jesus v. P&N Cuisine Inc. · No. 1:20-cv-03619
Judge
Ronnie Abrams
Date
Aug. 11, 2022

Background

The plaintiffs previously obtained a partial default judgment against P&N Cuisine Inc. and Nimnual Likituarin. On June 10, 2021, the court granted in part and denied in part the plaintiffs’ motion for default judgment and referred the case for an inquiry into damages and attorneys’ fees.

Magistrate Judge Willis issued a July 13, 2022 Report and Recommendation. It recommended awarding the plaintiffs $135,942.00 in damages against the defaulting defendants, plus prejudgment interest, and $3,300.00 in attorneys’ fees and costs. The opinion identifies components of the recommended damages as unpaid wages, unpaid spread-of-hours pay, violations of New York wage-notice and wage-statement requirements, unlawful deductions, and liquidated damages. The excerpt does not provide the complete itemization of the total award.

Review of the Recommendation

No party filed objections. Because there were no objections, the court reviewed the recommendation for clear error, meaning an obvious mistake in the record. The court found no error and adopted Judge Willis’s Report and Recommendation in its entirety.

The court also addressed the recommendation to award fees for work performed by one of the plaintiffs’ lawyers, Michael Faillace, who had been temporarily suspended from practicing law. It found no clear error in awarding those fees because his work predated the suspension and he had left the law firm then representing the plaintiffs.

Ruling

Judge Ronnie Abrams awarded the plaintiffs $135,942.00 in damages against the defaulting defendants, plus prejudgment interest as calculated by the Clerk of Court, and $3,300.00 in attorneys’ fees and costs. The court directed the Clerk to enter judgment for the plaintiffs and close the case.

The authoritative version

Read the full 2-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.

Open opinion PDF →
Summary written with AI assistance. See how summaries are made. Spot something wrong? Tell us.