Court, Explained
U.S. Federal District Courts
←Back to docket
S.D.N.Y.Procedural orderFiled Aug. 16, 2022

Doncouse v. 177 Nap, Inc.

Judge
Ronnie Abrams
Docket
1:22-cv-02706
Court
U.S. District Court · Southern District of New York
Pages
1
Civil ProcedureContract
In one sentence

In Doncouse v. 177 Nap, Judge Abrams discontinued the settled action without costs, allowing restoration within 30 days.

Who this affects

The parties to Doncouse v. 177 Nap, Inc.; the action was closed after the parties reported reaching a settlement.

What happened

In Doncouse v. 177 Nap, Inc., the parties reported that they had reached a settlement covering all issues.

The court discontinued the action without costs to any party and allowed an application to restore it within 30 days. The court directed the Clerk of Court to close the case.

Judge Ronnie Abrams also stated that any settlement-enforcement request would require the agreement’s terms to be placed on the public record and approved by the court within the same 30-day period.

The detailed version

For law students, journalists, and other readers who want the full reasoning

Case
Doncouse v. 177 Nap, Inc. · No. 1:22-cv-02706
Judge
Ronnie Abrams
Date
Aug. 16, 2022

Background The opinion states that the parties had reported reaching a settlement on all issues. It does not describe the underlying claims or the settlement’s terms.

Court’s action The court ordered that the action be discontinued without costs to any party and without prejudice to restoring the action to the court’s docket if an application to restore it was made within 30 days. It stated that any application to reopen filed after that period could be denied solely because it was late. The Clerk of Court was directed to close the case.

Settlement enforcement The court stated that, if the parties wanted the court to retain jurisdiction to enforce the settlement agreement, the agreement’s terms had to be placed on the public record and approved by the court within the same 30-day period.

Ruling Judge Ronnie Abrams entered the discontinuance order based on the reported settlement. The opinion does not resolve the merits of the underlying dispute.

The authoritative version

Read the full 1-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.

Open opinion PDF →
Summary written with AI assistance. See how summaries are made. Spot something wrong? Tell us.