Court, Explained
U.S. Federal District Courts
←Back to docket
S.D.N.Y.Procedural orderFiled Aug. 18, 2022

Dicks v. Michael Stars, Inc.

Judge
Gregory Woods
Docket
1:22-cv-06540
Court
U.S. District Court · Southern District of New York
Pages
2
Civil Procedure
In one sentence

In Dicks v. Michael Stars, Judge Woods dismissed the case without prejudice after Dicks twice failed to answer venue-related court orders.

Who this affects

Valerie Dicks and the other people she sought to represent were affected by the dismissal; Michael Stars, Inc. was the defendant in the closed case.

What happened

In Dicks v. Michael Stars, Inc., the court ordered Valerie Dicks to explain why the case belonged in the Southern District of New York. The court set an August 12, 2022 deadline, but Dicks did not respond.

The court then ordered Dicks to respond by August 17, 2022, but she again did not respond. The opinion does not describe the underlying claims or decide whether the case was properly venued.

Judge Gregory H. Woods dismissed the case without prejudice for failure to comply with two court orders and directed the Clerk of Court to close the case.

The detailed version

For law students, journalists, and other readers who want the full reasoning

Case
Dicks v. Michael Stars, Inc. · No. 1:22-cv-06540
Judge
Gregory Woods
Date
Aug. 18, 2022

Background

Valerie Dicks brought the case on behalf of herself and others described in the caption as similarly situated. On August 5, 2022, the court ordered Dicks to show why the case was properly venued, or located for legal purposes, in the Southern District of New York by August 12, 2022.

Dicks did not respond by that deadline. The court then ordered her to respond to the earlier order promptly and no later than August 17, 2022. She again did not respond.

Ruling

Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(b) allows a district court to dismiss a complaint when a party fails to comply with a court order, treating the failure as a failure to prosecute the case. Because Dicks failed to comply with two court orders, Judge Gregory H. Woods dismissed the case without prejudice. The Clerk of Court was directed to close the case. The opinion does not address the merits of Dicks's underlying claims.

The authoritative version

Read the full 2-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.

Open opinion PDF →
Summary written with AI assistance. See how summaries are made. Spot something wrong? Tell us.