Court, Explained
U.S. Federal District Courts
←Back to docket
S.D.N.Y.Procedural orderFiled Aug. 18, 2022

Weekes v. UMG Commercial Services, Inc.

Judge
Ronnie Abrams
Docket
1:21-cv-10788
Court
U.S. District Court · Southern District of New York
Pages
1
Civil ProcedureClass Action
In one sentence

In Weekes v. UMG Commercial Services, Inc., Judge Abrams closed the settled case, allowing restoration within 30 days and imposing no fees or costs.

Who this affects

Robert Weekes, UMG Commercial Services, Inc., and the other people described in the caption as similarly situated were affected by the discontinuance and case closure. The opinion does not state that a class was certified.

What happened

In Weekes v. UMG Commercial Services, Inc., the court was informed that all parties had reached a settlement.

The court discontinued the case without fees or costs for any party. It allowed the case to be restored to the court’s docket if an application was made within 30 days.

Judge Abrams directed the clerk to close the case. Any request for the court to keep authority to enforce the settlement had to be placed on the public record and approved by the court within the same 30-day period.

The detailed version

For law students, journalists, and other readers who want the full reasoning

Case
Weekes v. UMG Commercial Services, Inc. · No. 1:21-cv-10788
Judge
Ronnie Abrams
Date
Aug. 18, 2022

Background

The opinion states that the court was informed that a settlement had been reached among all parties. The plaintiff, Robert Weekes, brought the action individually and on behalf of others described in the caption as similarly situated. The defendant was UMG Commercial Services, Inc.

Ruling

The court ordered that the action be discontinued without fees or costs to any party and without prejudice to restoring the action to the court’s docket. An application to restore or reopen the action had to be filed within 30 days of the order; the court stated that a later application could be denied solely because it was untimely.

The court also stated that, if the parties wanted it to retain jurisdiction to enforce the settlement agreement, the agreement’s terms had to be placed on the public record and approved by the court within that same 30-day period. The clerk was directed to close the case.

Effect

The order ended the action based on the reported settlement but preserved a 30-day opportunity to seek restoration. The opinion does not describe the settlement’s terms or decide the underlying claims.

The authoritative version

Read the full 1-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.

Open opinion PDF →
Summary written with AI assistance. See how summaries are made. Spot something wrong? Tell us.