Court, Explained
U.S. Federal District Courts
←Back to docket
S.D.N.Y.Procedural orderFiled Aug. 19, 2022

PharmacyChecker.com LLC v. National Association of Boards of Pharmacy

Judge
Kenneth Karas
Docket
7:19-cv-07577
Court
U.S. District Court · Southern District of New York
Pages
5
Civil ProcedureAntitrust
In one sentence

In PharmacyChecker.com v. National Association of Boards of Pharmacy, Judge Karas granted PharmacyChecker.com’s motion to permanently seal specified materials.

Who this affects

PharmacyChecker.com LLC, the defendants whose related filings were included, the accredited-pharmacy non-parties whose information appeared in the materials, and members of the public seeking access to the court filings.

What happened

PharmacyChecker.com LLC asked the court to permanently seal three groups of briefs, statements, declarations, and exhibits filed in connection with the parties’ summary-judgment and expert-testimony motions. The case is PharmacyChecker.com LLC v. National Association of Boards of Pharmacy.

PharmacyChecker.com argued that the materials contained confidential business strategies, operational information, financial and pricing information, and information about its accredited-pharmacy customers. It said disclosure could harm its competitive position or invade the privacy interests of non-parties.

The court granted the motion to permanently seal the specified materials and directed the Clerk of Court to terminate the pending motion. Judge Kenneth M. Karas entered the order on August 19, 2022.

The detailed version

For law students, journalists, and other readers who want the full reasoning

Case
PharmacyChecker.com LLC v. National Association of Boards of Pharmacy · No. 7:19-cv-07577
Judge
Kenneth Karas
Date
Aug. 19, 2022

Background

PharmacyChecker.com LLC asked the court to permanently seal three groups of materials filed in connection with the parties’ motions for summary judgment on a Sherman Act Section 1 claim and motions concerning expert testimony. The materials included memoranda, statements of material facts, declarations, exhibits, and a pre-motion letter. The motion stated that the materials had previously been placed under conditional seal.

Request and reasons

PharmacyChecker.com argued that the materials contained proprietary information about its operations, business strategies, website users, internal systems, marketing practices, financial condition, pricing, and pharmacy-verification and listing programs. It also identified confidential information about accredited pharmacies, including details about their organization, operations, finances, and contractual relationships. PharmacyChecker.com argued that public disclosure could give competitors valuable business information, cause competitive harm, or invade the privacy interests of non-parties.

The motion described the legal standard as requiring a court to balance the public’s qualified right of access to judicial documents against countervailing interests, including protection of confidential business information and third-party privacy interests.

Ruling

The court granted PharmacyChecker.com’s motion to permanently seal the referenced materials. It directed the Clerk of Court to terminate the pending motion at Docket No. 289. This order addressed sealing and public access; the provided text does not show a ruling on the underlying summary-judgment or expert-testimony motions.

The authoritative version

Read the full 5-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.

Open opinion PDF →
Summary written with AI assistance. See how summaries are made. Spot something wrong? Tell us.