PharmacyChecker.com LLC v. National Association of Boards of Pharmacy
- Kenneth Karas
- 7:19-cv-07577
- U.S. District Court · Southern District of New York
- 5
In PharmacyChecker.com v. National Association of Boards of Pharmacy, Judge Karas granted PharmacyChecker.com’s motion to permanently seal specified materials.
PharmacyChecker.com LLC, the defendants whose related filings were included, the accredited-pharmacy non-parties whose information appeared in the materials, and members of the public seeking access to the court filings.
What happened
PharmacyChecker.com LLC asked the court to permanently seal three groups of briefs, statements, declarations, and exhibits filed in connection with the parties’ summary-judgment and expert-testimony motions. The case is PharmacyChecker.com LLC v. National Association of Boards of Pharmacy.
PharmacyChecker.com argued that the materials contained confidential business strategies, operational information, financial and pricing information, and information about its accredited-pharmacy customers. It said disclosure could harm its competitive position or invade the privacy interests of non-parties.
The court granted the motion to permanently seal the specified materials and directed the Clerk of Court to terminate the pending motion. Judge Kenneth M. Karas entered the order on August 19, 2022.
The detailed version
- PharmacyChecker.com LLC v. National Association of Boards of Pharmacy · No. 7:19-cv-07577
- Kenneth Karas
- Aug. 19, 2022
Background
PharmacyChecker.com LLC asked the court to permanently seal three groups of materials filed in connection with the parties’ motions for summary judgment on a Sherman Act Section 1 claim and motions concerning expert testimony. The materials included memoranda, statements of material facts, declarations, exhibits, and a pre-motion letter. The motion stated that the materials had previously been placed under conditional seal.
Request and reasons
PharmacyChecker.com argued that the materials contained proprietary information about its operations, business strategies, website users, internal systems, marketing practices, financial condition, pricing, and pharmacy-verification and listing programs. It also identified confidential information about accredited pharmacies, including details about their organization, operations, finances, and contractual relationships. PharmacyChecker.com argued that public disclosure could give competitors valuable business information, cause competitive harm, or invade the privacy interests of non-parties.
The motion described the legal standard as requiring a court to balance the public’s qualified right of access to judicial documents against countervailing interests, including protection of confidential business information and third-party privacy interests.
Ruling
The court granted PharmacyChecker.com’s motion to permanently seal the referenced materials. It directed the Clerk of Court to terminate the pending motion at Docket No. 289. This order addressed sealing and public access; the provided text does not show a ruling on the underlying summary-judgment or expert-testimony motions.
Read the full 5-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.