Court, Explained
U.S. Federal District Courts
←Back to docket
S.D.N.Y.Procedural orderFiled Aug. 23, 2022

Creative Glassware Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Lifestyle International LLC

Judge
Louis Stanton
Docket
1:22-cv-04074
Court
U.S. District Court · Southern District of New York
Pages
2
Civil ProcedureFee Petition
In one sentence

In Creative Glassware v. Lifestyle International, Judge Cott set procedures and deadlines for deciding damages and possible attorney’s fees.

Who this affects

Creative Glassware Industrial Co., Ltd. and Lifestyle International LLC, particularly their submissions concerning damages, attorney’s fees, costs, and any request for an evidentiary hearing.

What happened

Creative Glassware Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Lifestyle International LLC concerns the court’s process for deciding damages after Judge Stanton referred the case to Judge Cott for a damages review.

The court ordered Creative Glassware to submit any additional damages-related materials by September 6, 2022. Any request for attorney’s fees had to include time records, attorney experience and billing rates, fee calculations, legal support, and evidence for requested costs. Lifestyle International could respond by September 20, 2022.

Judge Cott ordered that the damages review could be decided from written submissions alone. Any party seeking a hearing had to explain why one was needed and identify the expected witnesses and evidence. The order did not decide the amount of damages or attorney’s fees.

The detailed version

For law students, journalists, and other readers who want the full reasoning

Case
Creative Glassware Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Lifestyle International LLC · No. 1:22-cv-04074
Judge
Louis Stanton
Date
Aug. 23, 2022

Background

On August 19, 2022, Judge Louis Stanton referred the case to Magistrate Judge James L. Cott to conduct an inquest into damages. An inquest is a court process for determining the amount of damages after liability has otherwise been addressed. This order established the procedures and deadlines for that process; it did not determine the amount of damages.

Required Submissions

The court directed Creative Glassware Industrial Co., Ltd. to file any additional submissions concerning the damages inquest by September 6, 2022. The plaintiff also had to file proof that its submissions had been served on Lifestyle International LLC and include a copy of the order.

If the plaintiff sought attorney’s fees, its submission had to include contemporaneous time records identifying, for each attorney, the date of service, hours worked, and nature of the work. Counsel also had to provide an affidavit stating each attorney’s years of bar admission and hourly rate, charts concerning the requested fees when appropriate, and the legal basis for the fee request, including why the number of attorneys involved was entitled to fees. The plaintiff also had to provide documentary support for any requested costs.

Lifestyle International LLC was required to respond by September 20, 2022. The court would treat the matter as fully submitted on that date.

Hearing and Disposition

The court notified the parties that it might decide the damages inquest solely on their written submissions. A party seeking an evidentiary hearing had to explain why written submissions were insufficient and describe the witnesses and evidence that would be presented. Judge James L. Cott issued a scheduling order governing the damages inquest. The opinion does not state the eventual amount of damages, rule on attorney’s fees or costs, or decide the underlying claims.

The authoritative version

Read the full 2-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.

Open opinion PDF →
Summary written with AI assistance. See how summaries are made. Spot something wrong? Tell us.