Court, Explained
U.S. Federal District Courts
←Back to docket
S.D.N.Y.Procedural orderFiled Aug. 24, 2022

Pagan v. C.I. Lobster Corp.

Judge
Andrew Carter
Docket
1:20-cv-07349
Court
U.S. District Court · Southern District of New York
Pages
1
Civil ProcedureContract
In one sentence

In Pagan v. Lobster Corp., Judge Carter approved the parties’ settlement and dismissed the entire case with prejudice, without fees or costs except as agreed.

Who this affects

The order affects Joseph Pagan, the named defendants, and the others similarly situated identified in the caption. The opinion does not explain the settlement’s practical effects.

What happened

In Pagan v. C.I. Lobster Corp., Joseph Pagan and the defendants submitted a settlement agreement and asked the court to approve it as fair and reasonable.

The court reviewed the agreement under the required standard for approving settlements in wage-related cases. The opinion does not describe the underlying claims or the settlement’s specific terms.

Judge Andrew L. Carter, Jr. found the settlement fair and reasonable, approved it, and ordered the entire case dismissed with prejudice. The parties will bear no fees or costs except those they agreed to pay.

The detailed version

For law students, journalists, and other readers who want the full reasoning

Case
Pagan v. C.I. Lobster Corp. · No. 1:20-cv-07349
Judge
Andrew Carter
Date
Aug. 24, 2022

Background

Joseph Pagan brought the case individually and on behalf of others similarly situated against Lobster Corp., Joseph Mandarino, Richard Mandarino, and John Mandarino. The court received the parties’ Settlement Agreement and General Release, filed July 22, 2022, along with their request for an order finding the settlement fair and reasonable.

Court’s analysis

The court reviewed the settlement as required by Cheeks v. Freeport Pancake House, Inc., a case requiring judicial review of certain settlements. The opinion states that the court found the agreement fair and reasonable. It does not explain the underlying claims or provide the settlement’s terms.

Disposition

Judge Andrew L. Carter, Jr. approved the settlement. The court ordered the entire case dismissed with prejudice, meaning the case is closed and the claims may not be brought again in that case. The order states that there would be no fees or costs except as agreed to by the parties.

Classification

This is a procedural order because the court approved a settlement and dismissed the case without deciding the underlying claims on their merits.

The authoritative version

Read the full 1-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.

Open opinion PDF →
Summary written with AI assistance. See how summaries are made. Spot something wrong? Tell us.