Court, Explained
U.S. Federal District Courts
←Back to docket
S.D.N.Y.Procedural orderFiled Aug. 29, 2022

Trustees Of The New York City District Council Of Carpenters Pension Fund v…

Full caption

Trustees Of The New York City District Council Of Carpenters Pension Fund, Welfare Fund, Annuity Fund, and Apprenticeship, Journeyman Retraining, Educational and Industry Fund v. A&C Brothers Contracting Inc.

Judge
Lorna Schofield
Docket
1:22-cv-06445
Court
U.S. District Court · Southern District of New York
Pages
1
ArbitrationSummary JudgmentCivil Procedure
In one sentence

In Trustees of the Carpenters Funds v. A&C Brothers, Judge Schofield treated an unanswered arbitration-confirmation petition as an unopposed summary-judgment motion.

Who this affects

The Trustees of the New York City District Council of Carpenters funds and A&C Brothers Contracting Inc.; the order determines how the unanswered petition will be considered but does not decide the petition's merits.

What happened

The Trustees of the New York City District Council of Carpenters funds filed a petition asking the court to confirm an arbitration award against A&C Brothers Contracting Inc. A&C Brothers was served on August 2, 2022, but did not appear or respond by the August 23 deadline.

The court explained that unanswered petitions to confirm or overturn arbitration awards generally should not result in an automatic default judgment. Instead, the court treats the petition as an unopposed motion for summary judgment, meaning the court can decide it based on the written submissions.

Judge Lorna G. Schofield ordered that the petition be treated as an unopposed summary-judgment motion. She deemed the motion fully briefed and stated that it would be decided based on the papers already filed; this order did not itself decide whether the arbitration award would be confirmed.

The detailed version

For law students, journalists, and other readers who want the full reasoning

Case
Trustees Of The New York City District Council Of Carpenters Pension Fund v… · No. 1:22-cv-06445
Judge
Lorna Schofield
Date
Aug. 29, 2022

Background

The action concerns a petition to confirm an arbitration award. The petitioners are the listed Trustees of the New York City District Council of Carpenters funds. The respondent is A&C Brothers Contracting Inc.

The opinion states that A&C Brothers was served on August 2, 2022, but had not appeared. Its deadline to answer, move, or otherwise respond to the petition was August 23, 2022.

Ruling

The court cited the rule that default judgments are generally inappropriate in proceedings to confirm or overturn arbitration awards. Instead, an unanswered petition should be treated as an unopposed motion for summary judgment. Summary judgment is a decision based on the filed materials when the court determines that no trial is needed.

The court ordered that the petition be treated as an unopposed motion for summary judgment. It deemed the petitioners' motion fully briefed and stated that the motion would be decided on the papers already filed. The order did not rule on the ultimate question of whether the arbitration award should be confirmed.

Date discrepancy

The supplied case information gives a filing date of August 29, 2022, while the opinion's text states “Dated: August 29, 2021.” The opinion also refers to service and response dates in 2022. This summary uses the date printed in the opinion's signature block for the metadata header.

The authoritative version

Read the full 1-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.

Open opinion PDF →
Summary written with AI assistance. See how summaries are made. Spot something wrong? Tell us.