Trustees Of The New York City District Council Of Carpenters Pension Fund v…
Trustees Of The New York City District Council Of Carpenters Pension Fund, Welfare Fund, Annuity Fund, and Apprenticeship, Journeyman Retraining, Educational and Industry Fund v. A&C Brothers Contracting Inc.
- Lorna Schofield
- 1:22-cv-06445
- U.S. District Court · Southern District of New York
- 1
In Trustees of the Carpenters Funds v. A&C Brothers, Judge Schofield treated an unanswered arbitration-confirmation petition as an unopposed summary-judgment motion.
The Trustees of the New York City District Council of Carpenters funds and A&C Brothers Contracting Inc.; the order determines how the unanswered petition will be considered but does not decide the petition's merits.
What happened
The Trustees of the New York City District Council of Carpenters funds filed a petition asking the court to confirm an arbitration award against A&C Brothers Contracting Inc. A&C Brothers was served on August 2, 2022, but did not appear or respond by the August 23 deadline.
The court explained that unanswered petitions to confirm or overturn arbitration awards generally should not result in an automatic default judgment. Instead, the court treats the petition as an unopposed motion for summary judgment, meaning the court can decide it based on the written submissions.
Judge Lorna G. Schofield ordered that the petition be treated as an unopposed summary-judgment motion. She deemed the motion fully briefed and stated that it would be decided based on the papers already filed; this order did not itself decide whether the arbitration award would be confirmed.
The detailed version
- Trustees Of The New York City District Council Of Carpenters Pension Fund v… · No. 1:22-cv-06445
- Lorna Schofield
- Aug. 29, 2022
Background
The action concerns a petition to confirm an arbitration award. The petitioners are the listed Trustees of the New York City District Council of Carpenters funds. The respondent is A&C Brothers Contracting Inc.
The opinion states that A&C Brothers was served on August 2, 2022, but had not appeared. Its deadline to answer, move, or otherwise respond to the petition was August 23, 2022.
Ruling
The court cited the rule that default judgments are generally inappropriate in proceedings to confirm or overturn arbitration awards. Instead, an unanswered petition should be treated as an unopposed motion for summary judgment. Summary judgment is a decision based on the filed materials when the court determines that no trial is needed.
The court ordered that the petition be treated as an unopposed motion for summary judgment. It deemed the petitioners' motion fully briefed and stated that the motion would be decided on the papers already filed. The order did not rule on the ultimate question of whether the arbitration award should be confirmed.
Date discrepancy
The supplied case information gives a filing date of August 29, 2022, while the opinion's text states “Dated: August 29, 2021.” The opinion also refers to service and response dates in 2022. This summary uses the date printed in the opinion's signature block for the metadata header.
Read the full 1-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.
Related cases
- Trustees Of The New York City District Council Of Carpenters Pension Fund…May 2022
- Perrigo Newv. International Brotherhood
- Drywall Tapers and Pointers of Greater New York Local Union 1974, Affiliated…Aug 2021
- Access Biov. Division 5
- Global Gamingv. Razon
- Trustees for the Mason Tenders District Council Welfare Fund, Pension Fund…Jun 2023