Court, Explained
U.S. Federal District Courts
←Back to docket
S.D.N.Y.Procedural orderFiled Aug. 30, 2022

Carter v. Akinyombo

Judge
Nelson Roman
Docket
7:21-cv-00872
Court
U.S. District Court · Southern District of New York
Pages
3
Civil RightsCivil ProcedurePro Se
In one sentence

In Carter v. Akinyombo, Judge Roman ordered the U.S. Marshals Service to serve one defendant in the civil-rights case.

Who this affects

James Anthony Carter, Jr. and Michelle Centanni are directly affected. The Clerk of Court and the U.S. Marshals Service must carry out the service instructions.

What happened

Carter v. Akinyombo concerns James Anthony Carter, Jr.’s lawsuit under a federal civil-rights law alleging deliberate indifference to his serious medical needs. Carter is representing himself and had permission to proceed without paying court fees in advance.

Carter filed a Third Amended Complaint naming Michelle Centanni, A. Akinyombo, K. Ngbodi, and M. Baby. Centanni had not yet been served, so the court addressed how service should occur.

The court instructed the Clerk to prepare the required service paperwork and summons and deliver them to the U.S. Marshals Service for service on Centanni. Service must occur within 90 days after the summons is issued; Judge Nelson S. Roman said Carter should request more time if service is not completed within that period.

The detailed version

For law students, journalists, and other readers who want the full reasoning

Case
Carter v. Akinyombo · No. 7:21-cv-00872
Judge
Nelson Roman
Date
Aug. 30, 2022

Background

James Anthony Carter, Jr., formerly incarcerated at Fishkill Correctional Facility, brought this self-represented lawsuit under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. He alleges that the defendants were deliberately indifferent to his serious medical needs. The defendants named in the Third Amended Complaint are Michelle Centanni, A. Akinyombo, K. Ngbodi, and M. Baby.

The court had previously allowed Carter to proceed without paying court fees in advance. That permission requires the court and the U.S. Marshals Service to assist with serving the defendants. The opinion notes that prisoners must still pay the full filing fee over time, even when granted this permission.

Service Ruling

Michelle Centanni had not yet been served. The court directed the Clerk of Court to complete a U.S. Marshals Service Process Receipt and Return form, issue a summons, and provide the Marshals Service with the documents needed to serve Centanni at the address listed in the order.

The court stated that Centanni must be served within 90 days after the summons is issued. If service is not completed within that period, Carter should request an extension of time. The order addresses service only; the opinion does not decide whether Carter’s medical-needs claims are legally or factually valid.

Disposition

The court entered an order directing the Clerk to mail the order to Carter and to arrange service through the U.S. Marshals Service. Judge Nelson S. Roman did not rule on the merits of the claims in this order.

The authoritative version

Read the full 3-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.

Open opinion PDF →
Summary written with AI assistance. See how summaries are made. Spot something wrong? Tell us.