Court, Explained
U.S. Federal District Courts
←Back to docket
S.D.N.Y.Procedural orderFiled Aug. 30, 2022

The Sanborn Library LLC v. ERIS Information Inc.

Judge
Ona Wang
Docket
1:19-cv-02049
Court
U.S. District Court · Southern District of New York
Pages
2
Civil ProcedureDiscovery
In one sentence

In The Sanborn Library v. ERIS Information, Magistrate Judge Wang granted ERIS’s request to seal limited portions of a filing.

Who this affects

ERIS Information Inc., ERIS Limited Partnership, Eco Log Environmental Risk Information Services Ltd., Environmental Data Resources, LLC, and third parties whose confidential information appeared in the materials.

What happened

The Sanborn Library LLC v. ERIS Information Inc. involved ERIS’s request to seal portions of its reply supporting a motion to compel documents. ERIS said the excerpts contained confidential business information belonging to Environmental Data Resources, LLC and third parties.

The requested material included excerpts from privilege logs, business and marketing documents, communications with the Federal Trade Commission, and deposition testimony. ERIS said the request was limited to portions that revealed commercially sensitive information and that the case parties consented to the request.

Magistrate Judge Ona T. Wang granted the application and directed the Clerk of Court to close docket entry 175. The order did not provide additional reasoning or identify the specific excerpts sealed beyond the descriptions in the request.

The detailed version

For law students, journalists, and other readers who want the full reasoning

Case
The Sanborn Library LLC v. ERIS Information Inc. · No. 1:19-cv-02049
Judge
Ona Wang
Date
Aug. 30, 2022

Background

ERIS Information Inc., ERIS Limited Partnership, and Eco Log Environmental Risk Information Services Ltd. asked the court for permission to file under seal portions of ERIS’s reply supporting its motion to compel production of allegedly privileged documents. The request concerned portions of the reply that quoted or closely paraphrased exhibits from a declaration submitted with the motion to compel.

The request stated that the exhibits had been designated confidential or highly confidential under the amended protective order. The materials included excerpts from Environmental Data Resources, LLC’s privilege logs; documents concerning its copyright research, business affairs, and marketing, sales, and litigation strategies; communications between its counsel and the Federal Trade Commission concerning an investigation; and excerpts from deposition testimony by EDR employee Paul Schiffer.

Sealing request

ERIS argued that the quoted material contained commercially sensitive information whose disclosure could cause competitive injury. It said the request was narrowly limited to portions of the reply that implicated confidential information and that the interest in protecting that information outweighed the public-access presumption applicable to court records. The request also stated that the material supported a non-dispositive motion and was not part of a pleading. The parties’ counsel had conferred, and the request stated that the parties consented to it.

Ruling

Magistrate Judge Ona T. Wang granted the application. The Clerk of Court was directed to close docket entry 175. The order itself did not give further reasoning or specify the precise portions sealed beyond the descriptions in ERIS’s request.

The authoritative version

Read the full 2-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.

Open opinion PDF →
Summary written with AI assistance. See how summaries are made. Spot something wrong? Tell us.