Court, Explained
U.S. Federal District Courts
←Back to docket
S.D.N.Y.Procedural orderFiled Aug. 30, 2022

Woods v. Fitzcon Construction/Ren Corp.

Judge
Andrew Carter
Docket
1:20-cv-08088
Court
U.S. District Court · Southern District of New York
Pages
2
FlsaEmploymentCivil RightsCivil Procedure
In one sentence

In Woods v. Fitzcon Construction/Ren Corp., Judge Carter entered default judgment against Esco Hirf Co. Inc. and Martin Tevlin for listed labor and discrimination-law violations, deferring damages.

Who this affects

The ruling directly affects plaintiffs Edward Woods and Tyrone Hilton and defendants Esco Hirf Co. Inc. and Martin Tevlin. The default judgment was entered only against Esco Hirf Co. Inc. and Martin Tevlin, and damages were not yet calculated.

What happened

In Woods v. Fitzcon Construction/Ren Corp., Edward Woods and Tyrone Hilton sought a default judgment against Esco Hirf Co. Inc. and Martin Tevlin. The case involved alleged violations of federal and New York wage, labor, and discrimination laws.

Magistrate Judge Sarah L. Cave issued a report recommending default judgment. No objections were filed, and the district court found no clear error in the record.

Judge Andrew L. Carter, Jr. adopted the report in full and entered default judgment for the plaintiffs against Esco Hirf Co. Inc. and Martin Tevlin for violations of the Fair Labor Standards Act, New York labor and human-rights laws, New York City human-rights law, and a federal civil-rights statute. The court deferred calculating damages until the case is resolved and directed the plaintiffs to serve the order on those defendants.

The detailed version

For law students, journalists, and other readers who want the full reasoning

Case
Woods v. Fitzcon Construction/Ren Corp. · No. 1:20-cv-08088
Judge
Andrew Carter
Date
Aug. 30, 2022

Background

The plaintiffs are Edward Woods and Tyrone Hilton. The opinion concerns their motion for default judgment against Esco Hirf Co. Inc. and Martin Tevlin. The case had been referred to Magistrate Judge Sarah L. Cave for general pretrial matters, and the motion for default judgment against Esco Hirf Co. Inc. and Martin Tevlin had also been referred to her.

Report and Recommendation

Judge Cave issued a report and recommendation addressing the motion. The plaintiffs and defendants were notified of the right to object, but no objections were filed. When no timely objection is made, the district court may adopt the report if the record does not show clear error. Judge Carter reviewed the record and found no clear error.

Ruling

The court adopted the report and recommendation in its entirety. It entered a default judgment against Esco Hirf Co. Inc. and Martin Tevlin for violations of the Fair Labor Standards Act, New York Labor Law, New York State Human Rights Law, New York City Human Rights Law, and 42 U.S.C. § 1981. A default judgment is a judgment entered against a party that did not defend the case; the opinion does not describe the defendants' underlying conduct beyond identifying the statutory violations.

The court deferred calculating damages until the case is resolved. It directed the Clerk of Court to enter the default judgment and terminate the motion at ECF No. 55. The plaintiffs were directed to serve the order on Esco Hirf Co. Inc. and Martin Tevlin and file proof of service by September 7, 2022.

The authoritative version

Read the full 2-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.

Open opinion PDF →
Summary written with AI assistance. See how summaries are made. Spot something wrong? Tell us.