Ravi v. Citigroup Global Markets Holdings, Inc.
- Gregory Woods
- 1:21-cv-02223
- U.S. District Court · Southern District of New York
- 1
In Ravi v. Citigroup Global Markets Holdings, Inc., Judge Woods adopted the report and dismissed the second amended complaint with prejudice.
The ruling ended Umashankar Ravi and Saritha Ravi’s case against Citigroup Global Markets Holdings, Inc., dismissed their second amended complaint with prejudice, and denied permission to appeal without paying filing fees.
What happened
Umashankar Ravi and Saritha Ravi sued Citigroup Global Markets Holdings, Inc. The judgment refers to the plaintiffs’ second amended complaint but does not state the claims or the reasons for dismissal.
The court adopted a report and recommendation in full and dismissed the second amended complaint with prejudice. It also denied permission to appeal without paying fees, finding that any appeal would not be taken in good faith, and closed the case.
Judge Gregory Woods entered the ruling described in the judgment, dated September 1, 2022.
The detailed version
- Ravi v. Citigroup Global Markets Holdings, Inc. · No. 1:21-cv-02223
- Gregory Woods
- Sept. 1, 2022
Background
Umashankar Ravi and Saritha Ravi were the plaintiffs, and Citigroup Global Markets Holdings, Inc. was the defendant. The judgment concerns the plaintiffs’ second amended complaint. The excerpt does not identify the claims or explain the underlying reasons for dismissal.
Ruling
The court stated that, for the reasons given in its August 31, 2022 order, it adopted the report and recommendation in full and dismissed the second amended complaint with prejudice. A dismissal with prejudice ends the claims in the case and does not permit them to be brought again in that case.
The court also certified under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3) that an appeal would not be taken in good faith. It therefore denied permission to appeal without paying the filing fees. Judgment was entered, and the case was closed.
Judge
The ruling is attributed to Judge Gregory Woods. The excerpt provided is the judgment signed by the clerk and refers to the separate order adopting the report and recommendation.
Read the full 1-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.