Court, Explained
U.S. Federal District Courts
←Back to docket
S.D.N.Y.Procedural orderFiled Sept. 2, 2022

Mamatkulov v. Mount Sinai Health System

Judge
James Oetken
Docket
1:22-cv-06657
Court
U.S. District Court · Southern District of New York
Pages
3
Civil ProcedurePro Se
In one sentence

In Mamatkulov v. Mount Sinai, Judge Oetken ordered Marshals service of the complaint and denied appeal-related fee status.

Who this affects

Lazizjon Mamatkulov and Mount Sinai Health System; the order directs the Clerk and U.S. Marshals Service to complete service and affects Mamatkulov's ability to appeal without paying filing fees.

What happened

In Mamatkulov v. Mount Sinai Health System, Lazizjon Mamatkulov, representing himself, alleges that his employer fired him after a two-week absence for medical treatment. The court said the complaint could be read as raising claims under the Family and Medical Leave Act.

Because Mamatkulov was allowed to proceed without paying filing fees, the court ordered the Clerk to issue a summons and provide the U.S. Marshals Service with the documents needed to serve Mount Sinai Health System. The court extended the service deadline to 90 days after the summons is issued.

Judge Oetken also stated that any appeal from this order would not be taken in good faith and denied permission to proceed without paying fees for purposes of an appeal. The order requires Mamatkulov to request more time if service is not completed within the deadline and to notify the court of any address change.

The detailed version

For law students, journalists, and other readers who want the full reasoning

Case
Mamatkulov v. Mount Sinai Health System · No. 1:22-cv-06657
Judge
James Oetken
Date
Sept. 2, 2022

Background

Lazizjon Mamatkulov brings the action without a lawyer. He alleges that his employer wrongfully terminated his employment after he was absent for two weeks for medical treatment. The court stated that the complaint could be read as asserting claims under the Family and Medical Leave Act of 1993, a federal law concerning certain medical and family leave rights. The court had previously granted Mamatkulov permission to proceed without paying filing fees.

Service of the Complaint

Because Mamatkulov was proceeding without paying filing fees, the court stated that he could rely on the court and the U.S. Marshals Service to serve the defendant. The Clerk of Court was instructed to complete a U.S. Marshals Service Process Receipt and Return form for Mount Sinai Health System, issue a summons, and provide the Marshals Service with the paperwork needed for service.

The court explained that the usual rule requiring service within 90 days of filing the complaint did not apply in the same way because Mamatkulov could not serve the summons and complaint until the court reviewed the complaint and ordered the summons issued. The court extended the service period to 90 days after the summons is issued. If service is not completed within that period, Mamatkulov should request an extension. He must also notify the court in writing if his address changes, and the court stated that it may dismiss the action if he fails to do so.

Disposition

Judge Oetken ordered the Clerk to complete the service form and deliver the necessary documents to the U.S. Marshals Service. The court also certified that any appeal from this order would not be taken in good faith and denied permission to proceed without paying filing fees for purposes of an appeal. This order addressed service and appeal-related filing-fee status; it did not decide whether Mamatkulov’s employment allegations establish a violation of the Family and Medical Leave Act.

The authoritative version

Read the full 3-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.

Open opinion PDF →
Summary written with AI assistance. See how summaries are made. Spot something wrong? Tell us.