Court, Explained
U.S. Federal District Courts
←Back to docket
S.D.N.Y.Procedural orderFiled Sept. 2, 2022

St. John v. Reliance Communications

Judge
Stewart Aaron
Docket
1:20-cv-02252-SDA
Court
U.S. District Court · Southern District of New York
Pages
2
FlsaFee PetitionCivil Procedure
In one sentence

St. John v. Reliance Communications: Judge Aaron approved the parties’ Fair Labor Standards Act settlement and dismissed the action with prejudice.

Who this affects

Michael St. John and Reliance Communications et al.; the approved settlement resolves all issues in St. John’s Fair Labor Standards Act claims.

What happened

In Michael St. John v. Reliance Communications, the parties settled all issues in claims under the Fair Labor Standards Act after mediation. They asked the court to review and approve their settlement agreement.

The court found the settlement fair and reasonable based on the nature and scope of St. John’s individual claims and the risks and costs of further litigation. The court also approved $31,596.57 in attorney’s fees and costs, explaining that the amount was one-third of the total settlement amount plus costs.

Judge Stewart D. Aaron approved the settlement and dismissed the action with prejudice, without costs except as provided in the settlement agreement. The court retained jurisdiction to enforce the agreement and directed the Clerk of Court to close the case.

The detailed version

For law students, journalists, and other readers who want the full reasoning

Case
St. John v. Reliance Communications · No. 1:20-cv-02252-SDA
Judge
Stewart Aaron
Date
Sept. 2, 2022

Background

Michael St. John brought claims under the Fair Labor Standards Act, a federal law governing such matters as minimum wages, overtime, and related employment protections. After mediation, the parties reached a settlement resolving all issues. The parties consented to have United States Magistrate Judge Stewart D. Aaron decide the disposition of the case under 28 U.S.C. § 636(c).

The court had directed the parties to submit the settlement agreement and a letter explaining why the settlement—including attorney’s fees and costs—was fair, reasonable, and adequate under Cheeks v. Freeport Pancake House, Inc. The parties first submitted a proposed agreement and later filed a fully executed version.

Court’s Analysis

The court reviewed the proposed settlement and found it fair and reasonable in light of the nature and scope of St. John’s individual claims and the risks and expenses of additional litigation. St. John sought approval of $31,596.57 in attorney’s fees and costs, described as one-third of the total settlement amount plus costs. The court stated that courts in the Southern District of New York typically approve attorney’s fees equal to one-third of the total recovery and found the requested fees fair and reasonable. The court expressly made no findings about the reasonableness of counsel’s hourly rates.

Disposition

Judge Stewart D. Aaron approved the settlement. The action was dismissed with prejudice and without costs except as provided in the settlement agreement. The court retained jurisdiction to enforce the settlement agreement, and the Clerk of Court was requested to close the case.

The authoritative version

Read the full 2-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.

Open opinion PDF →
Summary written with AI assistance. See how summaries are made. Spot something wrong? Tell us.