Ecopetrol S.A. v. Offshore Exploration and Production, LLC
- 1:18-cv-10024
- U.S. District Court · Southern District of New York
- 1
In Ecopetrol S.A. v. Offshore Exploration and Production, LLC, the court denied Ecopetrol’s motion and confirmed the arbitration awards.
Ecopetrol S.A. and Offshore Exploration and Production, LLC are affected by the confirmation of the Interim Supplemental Award and Final Supplemental Award; the case is closed.
What happened
In Ecopetrol S.A. v. Offshore Exploration and Production, LLC, Ecopetrol asked the court to vacate part of a final supplemental arbitration award. The judgment does not describe the underlying dispute or Ecopetrol’s specific arguments.
The court denied Ecopetrol’s motion to vacate in part the Final Supplemental Award. It also confirmed both the Interim Supplemental Award and the Final Supplemental Award, relying on the Federal Arbitration Act’s requirement that an arbitration award be confirmed unless it is vacated, modified, or corrected.
The court entered judgment confirming the awards and closed the case. The judge is not identified in the provided opinion text; the judgment was entered by Clerk Ruby J. Krajick on May 24, 2024.
The detailed version
- Ecopetrol S.A. v. Offshore Exploration and Production, LLC · No. 1:18-cv-10024
- May 24, 2024
Background
The judgment concerns Ecopetrol’s motion to vacate part of a Final Supplemental Award issued in arbitration. The provided text refers to the court’s Opinion and Order dated May 23, 2024, but does not include that opinion or explain the underlying dispute, the arbitration proceedings, or the arguments supporting the motion.
Ruling
The court denied Ecopetrol’s motion to vacate in part the Final Supplemental Award. The court then confirmed both the Interim Supplemental Award and the Final Supplemental Award. It cited Section 9 of the Federal Arbitration Act, which requires an arbitration award to be confirmed unless the award is vacated, modified, or corrected.
Disposition
The court entered judgment confirming the two arbitration awards and ordered that the case be closed. The provided text does not identify the judge who issued the May 23 Opinion and Order. The May 24 judgment was signed by Clerk of Court Ruby J. Krajick through a deputy clerk.
Read the full 1-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.