Court, Explained
U.S. Federal District Courts
←Back to docket
S.D.N.Y.Procedural orderFiled Sept. 6, 2022

Jimenez v. Belle and June, Inc.

Judge
Ronnie Abrams
Docket
1:22-cv-05396
Court
U.S. District Court · Southern District of New York
Pages
1
Civil ProcedureClass Action
In one sentence

In Jimenez v. Belle and June, Inc., Judge Abrams discontinued the action after a reported settlement in principle, allowing restoration within 30 days.

Who this affects

The order affects Vanessa Jimenez, the people she sought to represent, and Belle and June, Inc. The action was discontinued, subject to a 30-day opportunity to seek restoration; the order also addressed the procedure for seeking court enforcement of any settlement.

What happened

Jimenez v. Belle and June, Inc. is a proposed class action brought by Vanessa Jimenez against Belle and June, Inc.; the opinion gives no details about the underlying claims.

The court was told that the parties had reached a settlement in principle. It discontinued the action without costs to any party and without prejudice to restoring it within 30 days.

Judge Ronnie Abrams directed the Clerk of Court to close the case. The order also said that any settlement terms must be placed on the public record and approved by the court within 30 days if the parties want the court to retain authority to enforce the agreement.

The detailed version

For law students, journalists, and other readers who want the full reasoning

Case
Jimenez v. Belle and June, Inc. · No. 1:22-cv-05396
Judge
Ronnie Abrams
Date
Sept. 6, 2022

Background

Vanessa Jimenez sued Belle and June, Inc., individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated. The opinion does not describe the claims or the parties’ underlying dispute.

Court’s Action

The court stated that it had been reported that the parties reached a settlement in principle. It ordered that the action be discontinued without costs to any party and without prejudice to restoring the action to the court’s docket if an application to restore it was made within 30 days. The order stated that an application filed after that period may be denied solely because it was late.

The court also stated that, if the parties wanted it to retain jurisdiction—the authority to oversee and enforce the settlement—the settlement terms had to be placed on the public record and approved by the court within the same 30-day period. The Clerk of Court was directed to close the case.

Result and Scope

The order discontinued the action; it did not describe the settlement terms, approve a settlement, or decide the merits of the underlying claims. Judge Ronnie Abrams entered the order on September 6, 2022.

The authoritative version

Read the full 1-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.

Open opinion PDF →
Summary written with AI assistance. See how summaries are made. Spot something wrong? Tell us.