Court, Explained
U.S. Federal District Courts
←Back to docket
S.D.N.Y.Procedural orderFiled Sept. 7, 2022

Contreras v. Black Onyx World LLC

Judge
Valerie Caproni
Docket
1:21-cv-09102
Court
U.S. District Court · Southern District of New York
Pages
2
Civil ProcedureClass Action
In one sentence

In Contreras v. Black Onyx World LLC, Judge Caproni dismissed the settled case with prejudice, without costs, and without binding absent putative class members.

Who this affects

Yensy Contreras and Black Onyx World LLC were bound by the dismissal and any settlement; absent putative class members were not bound.

What happened

In Contreras v. Black Onyx World LLC, the parties told the court they had reached an agreement in principle resolving all issues.

The court canceled scheduled conferences and deadlines, dismissed the case with prejudice without costs or attorneys’ fees to either party, terminated open motions, and closed the case. The parties could ask to reopen it within 30 days for good cause. The dismissal and any settlement applied only to the individual plaintiff and defendant and did not bind absent potential class members.

Judge Valerie Caproni also directed the clerk to remove the class-action language from the caption. The court did not retain authority to enforce the settlement unless the parties submitted the agreement and requested that authority within 30 days.

The detailed version

For law students, journalists, and other readers who want the full reasoning

Case
Contreras v. Black Onyx World LLC · No. 1:21-cv-09102
Judge
Valerie Caproni
Date
Sept. 7, 2022

Background

The parties notified the court on September 2, 2022, that they had reached an agreement in principle resolving all issues. The opinion does not describe the underlying claims or the settlement’s terms.

Rulings

The court ordered that all previously scheduled conferences and other deadlines be canceled. It dismissed the case with prejudice and without costs, including attorneys’ fees, to either party. The clerk was directed to terminate all open motions and close the case.

The parties could apply to reopen the case within 30 days. Any such application had to show good cause for keeping the case open in light of the settlement. The court stated that an application filed after 30 days, or filed without a showing of good cause, could be denied on that basis alone.

If the parties wanted the court to retain jurisdiction—legal authority—to enforce their settlement agreement, they had to submit the agreement and request an order expressly retaining that jurisdiction within the same 30-day period.

Putative Class

The court directed the clerk to remove the words “individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated” from the caption. Because the parties had not notified the court that they intended to comply with Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 23(e), which governs certain class settlements and dismissals, the dismissal and any settlement were effective only between Yensy Contreras individually and Black Onyx World LLC. They did not bind absent putative class members.

Disposition

The case was dismissed with prejudice and without costs, and the court ordered the case closed. The opinion does not state the settlement terms.

The authoritative version

Read the full 2-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.

Open opinion PDF →
Summary written with AI assistance. See how summaries are made. Spot something wrong? Tell us.