Nachison v. Equifax Information Services, LLC
- Ronnie Abrams
- 1:22-cv-02833
- U.S. District Court · Southern District of New York
- 1
Nachison v. Equifax, Judge Abrams discontinued the settled case without costs, while allowing restoration within 60 days.
Miriam Nachison, the people she sought to represent, and the defendants named in the action were affected by the court’s discontinuance and case closure; the order specifically addressed the settlement with Equifax Information Services, LLC.
What happened
In Nachison v. Equifax Information Services, LLC, the court was informed that the case had been settled with Equifax Information Services, LLC, the remaining defendant.
The court discontinued the case without costs to any party and without prejudice to restoring it to the court’s docket if an application was made within 60 days. The court also directed the Clerk of Court to close the case.
Judge Ronnie Abrams stated that any request for the court to retain jurisdiction to enforce the settlement had to be placed on the public record and approved by the court within the same 60-day period.
The detailed version
- Nachison v. Equifax Information Services, LLC · No. 1:22-cv-02833
- Ronnie Abrams
- Sept. 9, 2022
Background
Miriam Nachison brought the action individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated against Equifax Information Services, LLC, Experian Information Solutions, Inc., and American Express National Bank. The court stated that the case had been settled as against Equifax, which it described as the remaining defendant.
Ruling
The court ordered that the action be discontinued without costs to any party and without prejudice to restoring the action to the court’s docket if an application to restore it was made within 60 days. The court stated that an application filed after that period could be denied solely because it was late. The Clerk of Court was directed to close the case.
The court further stated that, if the parties wanted the court to retain jurisdiction to enforce the settlement agreement, the agreement’s terms had to be placed on the public record and approved by the court within the same 60-day period. The order did not describe the settlement’s terms or decide the merits of the claims.
Read the full 1-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.